This page was created by Alexis Kratzer. The last update was by Jeanne Britton.
The Digital PiranesiMain MenuAboutThe Digital Piranesi is a developing digital humanities project that aims to provide an enhanced digital edition of the works of Italian illustrator Giovanni Battista Piranesi (1720-1778).Works and VolumesGenres and SubjectsBibliographyGlossary and Abbreviations
View of the Piazza Navona above the ruins of the Circus of Domitian (2 of 2)
12018-12-04T15:57:39-08:00Alexis Kratzerb246b0b192071919d0499d7b3d52bbdb381776462284910Veduta di Piazza Navona sopra le rovine del Circo Agonaleplain2021-11-06T14:41:43-07:00Title: Veduta di Piazza Navona sopra le rovine del Circo Agonale Signature: Cav(alier). Piranesi F(ecit)Title: View of Piazza Navona above the ruins of the Circus of Domitian Signature: Made by the Knight PiranesiJeanne Brittone120651dde677d5cf1fd515358b14d86eb289f11In contrast to the previous aerial view, this second etching of the Piazza Navona allows beholders to experience the square up close. The jarring shift in perspective from above to below emphasizes a more visceral, and particularly visual, encounter with the Fontana del Moro and the people surrounding it. By substantially lowering the viewpoint, Piranesi calls attention to the act of looking and the print medium’s capacity to create new ways of experiencing architecture. Two figures in the foreground thematize and guide beholders to see the piazza. They occupy a position in the margins, entering the image from the bottom border of the composition, but it is also from this vantage point that the entirety of the space can be seen. The man at the lower edge with his back turned serves as a proxy for viewers. At once, viewers are distant observers and active participants in the life of the piazza. At the far left an older man also gestures to the fountain, as if to direct viewers to enjoy the variety of its aesthetic elements and abundant flow of water.
The movement, fluidity, and force of the water, rendered by Piranesi with the utmost precision and dynamism, perhaps relates to how fountains served as a “metaphor [for] the preoccupation with urban boundaries” (San Juan, 129). Here, two figures in the center foreground wash their baskets for selling or carrying produce, demonstrating fountains’ civic function: they supplied water to the neighborhood and were essential to the running of the weekly food market. In this capacity, they occupy the realm of public space. As powerful symbols of authority, they were also used for courtly and religious festivals. Piranesi’s up-close depiction of the Fontana del Moro highlights the ways fountains anchored public space. Indeed, Piranesi renders the fountains with greater precision and detail than in the previous view, detailing, for example, the Egyptian hieroglyphs on the obelisk of Bernini’s Fontana dei quattro fiumi. The fountain shown here takes up the foreground and the majority of the composition, whereas it is barely visible in the preceding view. Depicted with an almost life-like quality, the streams of water gush from fantastical sea creatures, nymphs, and lions. Through the inventive combination of sculpture, engineering, and hydraulics, the fountain provides theatrical spectacle, aesthetic pleasure, aural delight, as well as utilitarian services for the benefit of the public. In this sense, fountains embody both form and function. They represent marvels of modern design and as well as innovations in hydraulics and engineering that reclaim the piazza for public use.
However, Piranesi underlines the significance of fountains not only to the articulation of space, but also to the discipline of architecture. Piranesi identifies Bernini and Michelangelo as the “architects” of the two principal fountains of the piazza in the annotations of the previous view. The text of the fifth annotation additionally designates the Fontana del Moro itself as a work of architecture: “Fontana, Architettura di Michelangelo” [Fountain, Architecture by Michelangelo]. Though it is now attributed to Giacomo della Porta, there was some debate about its author during Piranesi’s time. More important than the attribution itself is Piranesi’s insistence on assigning authorship to artists, particularly modern artists, in the Vedute di Roma, such as Nicola Salvi (the Trevi Fountain) and Ferdinando Fuga (Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore). Piranesi’s use of “architecture” as a discipline and authorial role in his annotations promotes the status of the architect as a designer, engineer, and inventor, clarifying both early modern conceptions of architecture and Piranesi’s self-identification as an “architect.” (ZL)
To see this image in the Vedute di Roma, volume 16 of Piranesi’s Opere, click here.
1media/16 frontispiece.jpg2018-11-23T19:33:38-08:00Jeanne Brittone120651dde677d5cf1fd515358b14d86eb289f11Views of Rome (1 of 2)Jeanne Britton81Vedute di Romaimage_header2022-03-05T12:00:42-08:00Jeanne Brittone120651dde677d5cf1fd515358b14d86eb289f11