Thanks for your patience during our recent outage at scalar.usc.edu. While Scalar content is loading normally now, saving is still slow, and Scalar's 'additional metadata' features have been disabled, which may interfere with features like timelines and maps that depend on metadata. This also means that saving a page or media item will remove its additional metadata. If this occurs, you can use the 'All versions' link at the bottom of the page to restore the earlier version. We are continuing to troubleshoot, and will provide further updates as needed. Note that this only affects Scalar projects at scalar.usc.edu, and not those hosted elsewhere.
Petroleum, Refineries, and the FutureMain MenuAppreciating Oil Refinery ScienceBy Shailesh ThapaExploring Pollution and the Environmental Impacts Associated with Petroleum RefiningBy Bailey KlauseDisaster Risks and What Refineries Can do to Best PrepareBy Nick SteinhoferThe (In)visible Violence of Petroleum RefineriesBy Klara BeinhornGlobal Environmental Justice: Holding Oil Refineries ResponsibleBy Sam HermannHealth, Petroleum Refineries, and the FutureBy: Jake RamesContributorsOil Boom Inquiry 2017Jonathan Steinwandc8ac305627e647489509eb85de97dd9cc5413a58
Progress Through Action
12017-12-05T09:49:12-08:00Klara Beinhornc060574480f918c78093f5a48ae976084fc06ec22704910By Klara Beinhornplain2017-12-07T09:02:21-08:00Klara Beinhornc060574480f918c78093f5a48ae976084fc06ec2A coalition named “We Are Still In” consists of states, cities, universities, faith groups, and environmental activists who pledge to still take part in the Paris Climate Agreement despite the United States backing out. Journalist for National Geographic, Stephen Leahy, discusses how in November, the United Nation climate negotiations (known as COP 23) took place in Bonn, Germany. The United States came to the conference without any intention of promoting renewable energy options, for David Banks, Trump’s special adviser on energy and environment, argued the increase use of coal, gas, and oil was a “global reality.” He said the U.S. wants to help poor countries utilize coal and natural gas energy and warned for others not to try block those efforts. The America’s Pledge report was released in Bonn and estimated the “We Are Still In” coalition represents more than half of the U.S. economy (Leahy). “We Are Still In” represents those who aren’t letting the backing out of the Paris Climate Agreement determine their environmental impact. Even as our government may be a friend to oil, half of the U.S. economy is determined to follow the agreement’s terms on their own emissions proving there is a foundation to build off of in the fight for environmental justice. Following the terms to the Paris Climate Agreement is a positive step towards promoting environmental justice because the cleaner we get, the less pollution minority and low-income groups unequally face.
Environmental justice and climate racism is a tangible issue in the United States affecting many low-income individuals and minorities. As the Trump administration proves to be a friend to oil, it is society’s duty to push for the increased investment into renewables instead of oil infrastructure. Taking steps such as the “We Are Still In” coalition provides a base for a movement to wean ourselves off of petroleum products. In simple terms, the more we wean off of oil and switch to sources such as renewables, fewer refineries will be needed which cuts back on the unequal distribution of pollution caused by refineries. Although shifting to renewables completely is highly unlikely and far off into the future, the conversation needs to shift about oil infrastructure and the meaning behind it. Oil should be seen as temporary solution until we can find a better fix, meaning long-term petroleum infrastructure should not be implemented. Society needs to act against climate racism just as the “We Are Still In” coalition acted on their own behalf, not the government's. Part of our duty as citizens is to look out for those less represented. We need to look out for those who lack the political representations in order to fight against the climate racism being implemented upon them. Climate injustice is a concrete issue where one entity doesn’t have the power to solve all the issues, for society needs to come together and recognize environmental racism is real and push for more renewables.
Works Cited
Leahy, Stephen. “Half of U.S. Spending Power Behind Paris Climate Agreement.” National Geographic. 15 Nov. 2017. Web. 18 Nov. 2017.
12017-12-06T07:48:54-08:00Renewable Energy on the Grid1Photo by Kenueone. Taken 5 August 2016. Creative Commons License 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. Available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Renewable_Energy_on_the_Grid.jpg.media/Renewable_Energy_on_the_Grid.jpgplain2017-12-06T07:48:54-08:00