Conclusion
Making the Past Present: Union Station Restoration – A Political Facelift?Smith describes heritage as a “cultural process," a continuing dialogue with the past. By its nature, this dialogue includes many community and individual narratives and meanings beyond the “authorized heritage discourse.” We see an example of "individual meanings" in the YouTube clip that opens this essay. Architect Barry Padolsky, who contributed to the building's "heritage conservation plan," narrates his experience as a young man passing through Union Station on arriving in Ottawa, and tells how it has remained a cherished memory. Union Station, as a place, is linked in a meaningful way to his individual identity, as much as to our collective national heritage.
In the framework of critical heritage theory, "the fabric of a heritage object can change so long as the socio-cultural meanings are conserved" (Wells). At the same time, the negotiation of meanings of heritage "is a struggle over power…because heritage is itself a political resource” (Smith). So while the much-maligned Senate bathes in the station's glow, the public can at least reacquaint itself with a magnificent piece of Ottawa's history.
This page has paths:
- Making the Past Present: Union Station Restoration – A Political Facelift? Maegen Sargent
- Bibliography Maegen Sargent