Analysis
In this "Analysis" path, three students from English 507 at the University of Victoria—Alyssa McLeod, Jana Millar Usiskin, and Emily Smith—critically reflect on the use of Scalar throughout the graduate seminar. In so doing, they draw upon this book's content for evidence and articulate Scalar with ongoing debates about the role of multimodal scholarly communications in the humanities.
Author: Jentery Sayers
Word Count: 58
Author: Jentery Sayers
Word Count: 58
Begin this path: Analysis
- Digital Objects as Objects: The Illusion of Immateriality
- Digital Objects as Objects: Chun’s “Enduring Ephemeral”
- Digital Objects as Objects: The Problem of Metadata
- Investigating Metadata and Archival Resources
- Digital Objects as Objects: Objects Lost and Found
- Building as Writing: Writing as Building
- Building as Writing: Outsourcing Scholarship
- Building as Writing: Building as Research
- Mapmaking Tools
- Building as Writing: Digital Literacy
- Building as Writing: Challenging the Textual Bias
- Designerly Engagement: Shifting Modes of Scholarship
- Designerly Engagement: Navigation Etiquette
- Experimenting with Format: E-lit Materiality
- Designerly Engagement: Navigation Beyond the Class
- Designerly Engagement: Communicating Critical Reflection
- Workflow as Tacit Knowledge: Perpetually in Beta?
Previous page on path | Welcome, page 8 of 10 | Next page on path |
Discussion of "Analysis"
Add your voice to this discussion.
Checking your signed in status ...