This comment was written by Selin Erkisi-Arici on 6 Dec 2017.

Transboundary E-waste Main Menu Introduction: a map of the map. An introductory page for users after the landing page. Defining a starting point for the controversy map. A description of how we obtained a floating statement for the controversy map. Mapping the controversy on the web. A path containing the movements through the web corpus. Mapping the controversy on the scholarly web. A path leading users through the controversy as it can be traced in the scholalrly literature. Key findings. A short summary of key findings with links to appropriate parts of the map. Procedures for mapping the wild web. A path through the procedures we used to map the wild web. Procedures for mapping the scholarly web. A path through the procedures used to map the scholarly web. References, further reading, and tools. A page offering a list of suggested further reading and descriptions of main tools used in this controversy map.

Overall

6826
Thank you for this tremendous tool! No doubt, it is a valuable source of information. It is a complex tool which consists of many links and sometimes it gets complicated to navigate even a clear content list exists in the left top side of the page. However, a short brief of whole structure (a flow diagram or even a mind map) would be very helpful to have an overview before starting the use the tool. Besides a short introductive part, which explains the real aim of the web tool and why it was necessary to conduct such a tool, would be beneficial as well. Similarly, key findings part may be extended: a summary part that explains what the real findings are, may be a good idea. What was the aim, what is achieved and what are the main findings etc.

Contents of this reply:

  1. Key findings.