Transboundary E-wasteMain MenuIntroduction: a map of the map.An introductory page for users after the landing page.Defining a starting point for the controversy map.A description of how we obtained a floating statement for the controversy map.Mapping the controversy on the web.A path containing the movements through the web corpus.Mapping the controversy on the scholarly web.A path leading users through the controversy as it can be traced in the scholalrly literature.Key findings.A short summary of key findings with links to appropriate parts of the map.Procedures for mapping the wild web.A path through the procedures we used to map the wild web.Procedures for mapping the scholarly web.A path through the procedures used to map the scholarly web.References, further reading, and tools.A page offering a list of suggested further reading and descriptions of main tools used in this controversy map.Josh Lepawsky31444794f29f45991a28c6c997946216e765688eJohn-Michael Davisf787e14b50e5a81b5a0cddeca64901018c933909Donny Persaud113ae967bd2d3037d2982353d771c6ad48515166Grace Akesebb4c76b563d1dcb8fc6851361486b801fce50755Liwen Chen0afa93a5fb126f8db135c704ec2d04b9f33ea134
Network of authors and keywords.
12016-12-09T04:58:39-08:00Josh Lepawsky31444794f29f45991a28c6c997946216e765688e68262Files and data for network of authors and keywords.plain2016-12-09T05:02:19-08:00Josh Lepawsky31444794f29f45991a28c6c997946216e765688e
This page is referenced by:
12016-12-09T05:02:28-08:00The landscape of authors and keywords.9A network visualization of the connections between authors and keywords.plain2017-12-06T05:03:00-08:00An understanding of the scholarly landscape can be enhanced by visualizing relationships between authors and keywords that authors choose to describe their published work. The network visualization below has been designed to highlight both prominent authors and keywords.
We recommend clicking here or the "Source" tab below the visualization which will open the network in a separate browser window for easier viewing. Users can hover the cursor over terms and authors of interest. Clicking on nodes will bring up additional information. Users can also zoom in and out to areas of interest in the network using the magnifying glass icons at the bottom of the visualization. A search option allows users to search for terms of interest (if a given keyword is in the underlying network data, it will be highlighted in the visualization). Labeling of nodes was done to maintain legibility of the graph. If a given node or cluster of nodes appears without a label, users can simply zoom-in and the labels will appear automatically.
The network is visualized using an algorithm that puts the authors and keywords with the most connections to one another towards the center of the network. The least connected authors and keywords are pushed to the peripheries of the network. The full procedure for generating this visualization can be found here.
This visualization offers a wealth of information to help users orient themselves in the complex scholarly debates framing the issue of transboudnary movements of e-waste. For example, clicking on an author node (blue) will highlight the keywords associated with that authors work. It will also launch a side panel that offers information about the author including institutional affiliation at the time of publication, the source title(s) of documents published by that author, and a list of keywords associated with the author's published work.
Users are encouraged to explore this and other graphs to help orient themselves in the controversy and to ask questions about how the issue is shaped or framed by actors in the scholarly literature. Who are the most prominent authors (those near the center of the graph)? What institutional affiliations are most prominent? How are prominent authors situated with respect to keywords?