Thanks for your patience during our recent outage at scalar.usc.edu. While Scalar content is loading normally now, saving is still slow, and Scalar's 'additional metadata' features have been disabled, which may interfere with features like timelines and maps that depend on metadata. This also means that saving a page or media item will remove its additional metadata. If this occurs, you can use the 'All versions' link at the bottom of the page to restore the earlier version. We are continuing to troubleshoot, and will provide further updates as needed. Note that this only affects Scalar projects at scalar.usc.edu, and not those hosted elsewhere.
The Misogyny of WitchcraftMain MenuIntroductionHeinrich Kramer (1430-1505) and Malleus MalleficarumMalleus Maleficarum and MisogynyA noble science?Witchcraft and mental illnessThe beginning of the endList of works in the exhibitionFurther readingSue Luftscheinc3da4f338cfb5c3d980919bd84c8fb083c380bd6
In direct opposition to Kramer and the ideas presented in Malleus Maleficarum were the writings of Johann Weyer, a Dutch physician who, with the publication of his most influential work, De Praestigiis Daemonum, et Incantationibus, ac Veneficiis Libri V [On the Illusions of the Demons and on Spells and Poisons], in 1563, presented the view that witchcraft was not a heresy against the Church, or the manifestation of pacts with the Devil, but rather was an indicator of mental illness. He claimed that the crime of witchcraft was literally impossible, so that anyone who confessed to it was more than likely suffering some kind of mental disturbance. Historians believe that Weyer was the first to use the term “mentally ill” to describe those women accused of witchcraft, and it is women to whom Weyer refers, because for him witchcraft was both sex- and age-specific. Weyer backed his claims with descriptions of case histories from his own medical experience, and thus the text contains some of the earliest references to psychological treatments. Weyer’s work was influential for contemporary theologians and jurists who took up the idea that manifestations of witchcraft were the result of mental illness.
The second image displays the appendix, Pseudomonarchia Deamonum, in which Weyer lists the names and titles of evil spirits, and the powers that each supposedly wielded.
This page has paths:
12022-09-28T15:14:01-07:00Sue Luftscheinc3da4f338cfb5c3d980919bd84c8fb083c380bd6Witchcraft and mental illnessSue Luftschein7plain12182272025-01-09T12:37:33-08:00Sue Luftscheinc3da4f338cfb5c3d980919bd84c8fb083c380bd6
Contents of this path:
1media/IMG_0429_thumb.jpg2022-10-03T21:57:23-07:00Sue Luftscheinc3da4f338cfb5c3d980919bd84c8fb083c380bd6Johann Weyer, De praestigiis daemonum, Title page2Title pagemedia/IMG_0429.jpgfull2022-10-04T17:03:12-07:00Sue Luftscheinc3da4f338cfb5c3d980919bd84c8fb083c380bd6
1media/IMG_0430_thumb.jpg2022-10-03T21:58:31-07:00Sue Luftscheinc3da4f338cfb5c3d980919bd84c8fb083c380bd6Johann Weyer, De praestigiis daemonum, Pseudomonarchia daemonum2Pseudomonarchia daemonummedia/IMG_0430.jpgfull2022-10-04T17:03:23-07:00Sue Luftscheinc3da4f338cfb5c3d980919bd84c8fb083c380bd6