Beyond the Boundaries of Fantasia: An ancient imagining of the future of leadership

"I Know What Boys Like"

Gender and Leadership in Plutarch's Life of Mark Antony

Rome in the Late Republic (c. 147-30 BCE) had several things in common with the heroic world of Agamemnon and Achilles in the Iliad: continual warfare, deadly rivalries, and chances for everlasting glory. There are two main differences, though, from the perspective of leadership. One, the Late Roman Republic actually happened, and we can uncover its realities with a careful analysis of the sources from the time period, especially the historiographers like Plutarch (c. 46-120 CE). Two, the course of the Late Roman Republic was also steered by powerful and intelligent women, none more so that Cleopatra the Seventh (63-30 BCE), the final Ptolemaic Queen of Egypt. Whereas the "prizes" of war in Homer's Iliad, Chryseis and Briseis, have no say in their fates (though Briseis does in fact speak in Iliad 19.282-300), Cleopatra spoke many languages and played her role as "prize" to great advantage for herself and her people. This time period in general is thus a great place to study the role of gender in ancient leadership.

As the current presidential election cycle has made crystal clear, how we evaluate the actions, achievements, and character of a leader is often dependent -- consciously or not -- on a leader's gender. In this module, we will examine how beliefs, expectations, and stereotypes about gender affect perceptions of leadership. Plutarch's Life of Antony allows us to examine some of those gender dynamics in the context of ancient political biography. We will consider the construction of both femininity and masculinity, in Antony, Fulvia, Octavia, and Cleopatra, and how gender presentation negatively and positively affects the leadership abilities and achievements of the subjects of the Life.
 
Our ultimate goal is to to formulate cogent, well-substantiated answers to the following two questions:
 

This page has paths:

Contents of this path: