Censorship Debate
Obscenity laws are often brought up in response to Burlesque. These laws make is illegal to engage in the business of selling obscene matter. It is very vague what qualifies as "obscene matter" but Burlesque is said to sometimes fit the description. Many times Burlesque performers or managers have been arrested and sometimes venues were even shut down in the past. Police have been a part of Burlesque history and the censorship of Burlesque materials will continue to be debated into the future.
In the court case Jacobellis v. Ohio, a court decided how to determine what is considered obscene. This court case tries to define what qualifies as "obscene" and give knowledge to what breaks the laws and what is okay. The supreme court in 1964 in the Jacobellis v. Ohio case determined that a threshold test was needed to determine obscenity. This test, named, "I know It When I See It" allows the government lots of control in the censorship of obscene information. This vagueness of the supreme court case allows the authorities absolute control on deciding what can be considered obscene.
There has also been Burlesque shows banned and venues shut down for running Burlesque performances. Due to censorship and the use of public space, the government has been able to support their decisions to keep Burlesque from certain places, theaters, etc.
One example, Susan Press, a labour politician, bans a Burlesque show from being performed in a public venue. She states, "The portrayal of women in this type of show is something we fought against a generation ago," and also that "my committee took the view that a burlesque entertainment wasn't an appropriate use of a public building, and it would cause offence to a significant part of the community." (Hess). Many Burlesque performers were outraged that their art form was able to be censored and feel that this is just the beginning of what could become larger censorship.