A Genealogy of Refusal : Walking away from crisis and scarcity narratives

No individual solution to our problems

In the “The Dangers of Cynical Sci-Fi Disaster Stories” Cory Doctorow talks about "the characters’ dawning realization that there is no individual solution to their problems—that the kind of systemic change they want is a team sport and has to include people usually left on the sidelines in tech fights" (Doctorow, Oct 2020).

In  “Librarians of the World Unite!” a cartoon published in The Nib during the coronavirus pandemic we get a glimpse of how weak we are when we can't communicate with one another and how much change we can achieve if we organize ourselves to understand our common circumstances better.  


It's essential to organize to accomplish anything for a whole profession of people.   In Cory Doctorow's For the Win the protagonists build a movement that can challenge the status quo and along the way readers find out just how hard fought and hard won are their gains.  Those of us in the profession of librarianship, just like the mercenary gamers in For the Win,  have reasons to seek change. In “Collective Responsibility: Seeking Equity for Contingent Labor in Libraries, Archives, and Museums" we come face to face with voices that must be heard.

In  “Black Study, Black Struggle"   Robin Kelly reminds us of how "the university possesses a unique teleology: it is supposed to be an enlightened space free of bias and prejudice, but the pursuit of this promise is hindered by structural racism and patriarchy. "  Robin has a lot to teach us about the universities we work in, and the ways they are perceived by the students who study at them and the professors who work at them.    He talks about both "modest and more radical critics of universities" and how  "Both demand that universities change in ways that we cannot expect them to change."  He argues that  universities are not up the task[of modest or radical change] and leaves us with the notion that while "universities can and will become more diverse and marginally more welcoming for black students" that  "as institutions they will never be engines of social transformation". 

"Why?"  We must ask this question, for as academic librarians our jobs and our libraries are situated inside these very same universities.  There's not one university for the students and another for the library.  And, Robin reminds us that the university wont be the engine for transformation because "Such a task is ultimately the work of political education and activism. By definition it takes place outside the university."   Perhaps some of what we seek for and from libraries has to be similarly situated, and informed by the hard-won knowledge Robin shares, perhaps the change we week has to happen wholly or partly outside the library because it can't happen through it?

For us, as librarians, there  is no single solution or snake oil to repair all our profession's problems. As we battle the hero narrative and begin to shake off the mantle of vocational awe, we are also riding the waves of a never-ending supply of crisis narratives, diminishing budgets, and opportunities to live up to expectations that cross the line. To keep our heads above the water we will need a multi-tool in our pockets. Taking up Doctorow's message means acknowledging that we will come up with more solutions if more of our voices are heard, not just the most dominant/most cited, or the superheroes' voice or the rockstar librarians' voice but also the voice of the most disadvantaged and the most pained among us.

There is no single Superhero/Rockstar individual who can resurrect librarianship's  "once glorious kingdom" to it's real or imagined former prestige. Individually, not  even those among us who have organizational or professional power/prestige, can bring our entire profession to a sate of equity or equilibrium. But through communal consciousness raising among our profession, out on twitter, on librarian blogs, and in journals just like CJAL we can begin conversations, and mount collective, concerted efforts that allow us firmer ground upon which to resolve our issues and move forward together.

Our organizational weaknesses show. There's more than one reason we don't always refuse or debunk constructed scarcity when we could or should.  Our weaknesses were  hardfelt during the COVID-19 pandemic situation.  We recognize that'll it'll take more than one person, more than one action to situate ourselves better and that it will require collective as well as individual action. This does not mean we shouldn't have optimism to tackle the barriers that prevent us from occupying our profession more fully--we may be living in a cyberpunk dystopia, but there are avenues that allow us to design our way out of the situations we find ourselves in.

This page has paths:

This page references: