Micro-Landscapes of the Anthropocene

Reflection (Matthew Gurney)

Natalie and Simon’s reflection on the concept of “plant-blindness” inspired me when the mentioned the “myopia” of language used to describe the plant world as competitive and survivalist. Their use of “myopic” – literally short-sighted – made me think of Polyphemus from Homer’s Odyssey, who is one-eyed and then blinded. This made me think of plant blindness in relation to not being able to perceive depth – and in this sense we could consider how we limit natural spaces by “bubble-wrapping” them as Natalie and Simon mentioned. It seems in the Anthropocene we are not only plant blind in terms of recognising plants and understanding their importance, but also in the space we provide for them. Their interest analogy to making nature wallpaper moves nature from the third to second dimension, and this can be linked to what happens in zoos, where the idea of an animal’s indigenous habitat is squashed to fit into a closed environment, and in some cases the trauma this causes the animals is visible, such as in the polar bear hotel in China. It would be interesting to explore this depth-blindness, or “cycloptic vision”, and opposingly, plant-depth awareness, further.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/mar/12/chinese-hotel-with-polar-bear-enclosure-opens-to-outrage

This page has paths:

Contents of this reply: