Micro-Landscapes of the Anthropocene

Comment on close reading of 'Marginal Worlds'

Interaction and Intra-action:

The close reading of 'A brook in the City' makes an interesting reference to Karen Barad’s term of “intra-action”. However, in doing this, it raises the problem of looking at time interacting or intra-acting. The photo essay of a butterfly flapping its wings, and causing a tsunami is an interaction, an isolated event. In the same way it is anthropocentric time in a linear fashion – in isolation. The butterfly effect can be viewed as anthropocentric – a butterfly’s wings do not only interact with the environment, they must be “threaded through with the entanglements of parting” (Barad 406). Therefore, without intra-action, we cannot see the entanglement of the butterfly and the tsunami, or life and death, beyond cause and effect. A tsunami could cause a butterfly on the other side of the world to flap its wings. Therefore, a butterfly flaps its wings… and then must flaps its wings again, to stop it falling.

This page has paths:

Contents of this reply: