A photograph of John L. Lewis.
1 2016-05-03T22:30:21-07:00 Morgan Ebbs 37bb8427ec602849db4b409834ec5240edd22bd7 9410 1 John L. Lewis when he was a young man. plain 2016-05-03T22:30:21-07:00 Morgan Ebbs 37bb8427ec602849db4b409834ec5240edd22bd7This page has tags:
- 1 2016-05-03T22:31:43-07:00 Morgan Ebbs 37bb8427ec602849db4b409834ec5240edd22bd7 Who was John L. Lewis? Jamie McDaniel 5 A brief biography detailing the life of John L. Lewis. plain 2016-05-20T14:11:59-07:00 Jamie McDaniel 7d1c50d66443d970871743d62f90c2a04a2f2c84
This page is referenced by:
-
1
2016-05-03T22:31:43-07:00
Who was John L. Lewis?
5
A brief biography detailing the life of John L. Lewis.
plain
2016-05-20T14:11:59-07:00
John L. Lewis was president of the UMWA from 1920-1960. He was a giant among American leaders in the first half of the twentieth century, regularly advising presidents and challenging America's corporate leaders. His work to organize the country's industrial workers through the Congress of Industrial Organizations (CIO) in the 1930s helped raise living standards for millions of American families. In the first year of the CIO, nearly four million workers joined labor organizations and wages were raised by over a billion dollars. Lewis sent hundreds of UMWA organizers to help create some of the nation's leading labor unions, including the United Steelworkers of America (USWA), the United Auto Workers (UAW), the Communication Workers of America (CWA) and many other important labor organizations that continue to speak in behalf of America's workers.
John Llewellyn Lewis was born in Lucas, Iowa, on February.12, 1880, to Tom Lewis, a coal miner from Wales, and Ann Watkins. The first of seven children, Lewis for 10 years was formal education before joining his father in the mines at age 16. As a young man, Lewis served as the recording secretary of United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) Local Union 1933. In 1907, Lewis married Myrta Edith Bell and had three children. In the coal-mining town of Panama, Illinois, he became head of a United Mine Workers of America (UMWA) local, and in 1911 he became an organizer for the American Federation of Labor (AFL), with which the miners’ union was affiliated. Lewis became a vice president of the UMWA in 1917, acting president in 1919, and president in 1920, by which time the UMWA had become the largest trade union in the United States. He would remain the UMWA’s leader for the next 40 years. Lewis led a successful national coal strike in 1919, but during the 1920s the UMWA’s membership shrank from 500,000 to fewer than 100,000 as unemployment spread among UMWA members in northern states and nonunionized mines in the southern Appalachians increased their production.
Beginning in 1933, President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s New Deal presented organized labor with opportunities that Lewis exploited with energy and imagination. The formation of the National Recovery Administration through the National Industrial Recovery Act (1933) guaranteed labor the right to bargain collectively. This enabled Lewis to launch new organizing campaigns in the coalfields of Appalachia and elsewhere, tripling the UMWA’s membership within a few years. Beginning in 1935–36, Lewis presided over the often-violent struggle to introduce unionism into previously unorganized industries such as steel, automobile, tire, rubber, and electrical products.
Unions gained even more organizing rights with the 1935 passage of the Wagner Act (officially, the National Labor Relations Act). Building on previous labor victories, Lewis and several other AFL union leaders formed the Committee for Industrial Organization with the intention of organizing workers in mass-production industries.
Lewis was a lifelong Republican, but he had crossed party lines to support Roosevelt for the presidency in 1932 and 1936. He opposed Roosevelt’s third term, however, threatening to resign as CIO president if Roosevelt won. Interpreting Roosevelt’s victory as a repudiation of his own leadership, Lewis resigned as president of the CIO in 1940. In 1942 he pulled the UMWA out of the parent body. A series of miners’ strikes called by Lewis in the 1940s won wage increases and new benefits for miners but alienated large segments of the public. Antiunion sentiment spurred the passage of the Smith-Connally Anti-Strike Act (1943) and the Taft-Hartley Act (1947), both of which placed new restrictions on labour unions.
In the 1950s Lewis worked closely with mine operators to mechanize the industry, a strategy that increased productivity and ultimately enlarged the union benefits for the miners. Lewis won periodic wage and benefit increases for miners and led the campaign for the first Federal Mine Safety Act in 1952. Perhaps Lewis' greatest legacy was the creation of the UMWA Welfare and Retirement Fund in a contract with the federal government, signed in the White House with President Truman in attendance. The UMWA Fund would change permanently health care delivery in the coal fields of the nation. The UMWA Fund built eight hospitals in Appalachia and established numerous clinics. In 1964, Lewis was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the nation's highest civilian decoration, by President Lyndon Johnson. Lewis retired as president of the UMWA in 1960 but, remained Chairman of the UMWA Fund until his death in 1969 in Alexandria, Virginia.
-
1
2016-05-05T05:48:33-07:00
Conclusion
2
plain
2016-05-05T08:27:06-07:00
Looking at the letters and responses between John L. Lewis and Alexander Howat, at that the same understanding the background of both individual and the reasons why they were fighting, to help understand working rhetoric of the time. Both Lewis and Howat worked in the mines in their younger years and join the United Mine Workers of America, but while Lewis was more democratic and became President of the UMWA, Howat went more on the attack side, organizing strikes to gain workers’ rights. The men disagreed about the way of doing things and it started with the Kansas Industrial Relation Act in 1920 that banned strikes. Within the Hearl Maxwell Collection, there are letters, correspondence, and minutes between Lewis with Maxwell on his side, and Howat and by studying the words or subjects used and their relation to other words or subjects. The main goal is to examine the political dynamics between John L. Lewis/ Hearl Maxwell and Alexander Howat. Using the voyant took, cirrus, on a reply by Howat to Lewis to see Howat’s critique of Lewis’s ideas, with the main words being “conditions,” “workers,” “district,” and “Lewis” and by understand the use of the words and where relations to other words to see Howat’s overall influences and to show how bold Howat was. The looking at the trend of words including “president,” “mr,” “dear,” “sir,” and “brother.” These words indicate a certain level of formality and give the notion of a chain of authority to show that while Lewis and Howat disagreed they still had and showed respect to one other. Then looking at the two words with the largest connection to “workers” are “district” and “Lewis.” This shows the union workers first identity with what district they work under and then to the United Mine Workers of America, which Lewis was the president of at the time. The feud is mapped on a timeline that show when the feud started and end and when each man responded to the other. While the map of the mines, showed areas and mines there were the main focus on the Lewis/Howat feud. The two annotated video shows John L. Lewis dealing with mining problems and gives a better understanding of Lewis as a man and politician. As acting president in 1919, and president in 1920, by which time the UMWA had become the largest trade union in the United States. He would remain the UMWA’s leader for the next 40 years. Lewis led a successful national coal strike in 1919, but during the 1920s the UMWA’s membership shrank from 500,000 to fewer than 100,000 as unemployment spread among UMWA. The two video show Lewis’ change over time from democratic talking to more action. Our Scalar project shows how two men influences each other so much, in addition to depicting the manner in which class effects political action.