Whole Herbarium Physical Specimen Sheet of Polygonum lapathifolium
1 media/Physical Herbarium Specimen Sheet_thumb.jpg 2022-02-28T11:27:57-08:00 Moryel Yashar 10371b80dc53ee92566a2fccaf1cc9fa6abf3407 40021 4 Source: Consortium of California Herbaria (CCH2) plain 2022-03-08T15:19:01-08:00 Consortium of California Herbaria (CCH2) https://bisque.cyverse.org/image_service/image/00-Ta5cauVPC8NtY9htCPLR2k/resize:1250/format:jpeg 1946-07-19 39.30492 -120.525893 +-1000m. 20210922 105839 O. H. Kappler UCLA Herbarium - funded by the National Science Foundation Award Number 1802199 20210922 105839 Polygonaceae United States, California, Nevada, South Fork, Yuba River, Along Hiway 20 5700ft Point centered to elevation on S Fork Yuba River at intersection now with I-80 Polygonum lapathifolium L. Lexie Baughman 8e25a77aa976a9ae7f3f53b2f31421fb9623fd7eThis page has annotations:
- 1 2022-03-04T19:47:56-08:00 Lexie Baughman 8e25a77aa976a9ae7f3f53b2f31421fb9623fd7e P. lapathifolium flowers. Lexie Baughman 3 plain 2022-03-08T16:27:25-08:00 Lexie Baughman 8e25a77aa976a9ae7f3f53b2f31421fb9623fd7e
- 1 2022-03-04T19:47:30-08:00 Lexie Baughman 8e25a77aa976a9ae7f3f53b2f31421fb9623fd7e P. lapathifolium leaves are tear drop shaped. Lexie Baughman 3 plain 2022-03-08T16:27:26-08:00 Lexie Baughman 8e25a77aa976a9ae7f3f53b2f31421fb9623fd7e
- 1 2022-03-04T19:47:07-08:00 Lexie Baughman 8e25a77aa976a9ae7f3f53b2f31421fb9623fd7e Large leaf of P. lapathifolium. Lexie Baughman 3 plain 2022-03-08T16:27:26-08:00 Lexie Baughman 8e25a77aa976a9ae7f3f53b2f31421fb9623fd7e
- 1 2022-03-04T19:48:45-08:00 Lexie Baughman 8e25a77aa976a9ae7f3f53b2f31421fb9623fd7e Stem of P. lapathifolium. Lexie Baughman 3 plain 2022-03-08T16:27:25-08:00 Lexie Baughman 8e25a77aa976a9ae7f3f53b2f31421fb9623fd7e
- 1 2022-03-08T16:27:19-08:00 Lexie Baughman 8e25a77aa976a9ae7f3f53b2f31421fb9623fd7e The medicinal use of P. lapathifolium persisted, even as it was introduced to the Americas. Lexie Baughman 2 plain 2022-03-08T16:27:27-08:00 Lexie Baughman 8e25a77aa976a9ae7f3f53b2f31421fb9623fd7e
- 1 2022-03-08T16:26:42-08:00 Lexie Baughman 8e25a77aa976a9ae7f3f53b2f31421fb9623fd7e Particular parts of the plant have also been claimed to have medicinal uses. Lexie Baughman 2 plain 2022-03-08T16:27:27-08:00 Lexie Baughman 8e25a77aa976a9ae7f3f53b2f31421fb9623fd7e
- 1 2022-03-04T19:48:24-08:00 Lexie Baughman 8e25a77aa976a9ae7f3f53b2f31421fb9623fd7e Collection location of P. lapathifolium. Lexie Baughman 2 plain 2022-03-04T19:49:02-08:00 Lexie Baughman 8e25a77aa976a9ae7f3f53b2f31421fb9623fd7e
This page is referenced by:
-
1
2022-02-16T11:43:04-08:00
Comparing and Contrasting Polygonum lapathifolium and Eriogonum grande var. rubescens, Two Members of the Polygonaceae Family
56
Polygonum lapathifolium and Eriogonum grande var. rubescens each represent a plant species belonging to the two subfamilies of Polygonaceae, providing evidence of their shared ancestry and thus similarities in general structure and perhaps habitat. Documentations of Polygonum lapathifolium — as a physical specimen sheet belonging to the UCLA Herbarium and as a record in Materia Medica — and Eriogonum grande var. rubescens — displayed in the Mildred E. Mathias Botanical Garden — contribute to a contextual and practical understanding of their similarities and differences. An analysis of the information contained in these various specimens illustrate their comparative and contrasting modes of collection and their claimed uses and properties, which are mostly medicinal for Polygonum lapathifolium and garden-related for Eriogonum grande var. rubescens. - By Moryel Yashar and Lexie Baughman
plain
2022-03-13T22:51:34-07:00
This page presents Polygonum lapathifolium, as both an herbarium specimen and a Materia Medica entry, and Eriogonum grande var. rubescens, as a specimen in a botanical garden. These two species fall under the Polygonaceae, which are a family of flowering plants known informally as the knotweed or smartweed-buckwheat family in the United States. While the two plant species belong to separate genera, their shared inclusion under the same family is a meaningful commonality, as it informs an observer of their relatedness and their classification processes.
However, there are differences between these plants, beginning with their collection processes. In terms of herbariums, the collection process is rather methodical, since it gives value to the specimen. This process usually involves recording what was collected, where it was collected, when it was collected, and who collected it. This information is made readily available on herbarium specimen sheets, usually in the form of an attached label. Looking at the P. lapathifolium specimen, for example, an observer learns that this sample was collected by O. H. Kappler around the South Fork of the Yuba River in 1946. Although this process has become standardized with the establishment of herbariums, the core elements of this practice have been observed for some time. This is clear when analyzing the Materia Medica entry of P. lapathifolium, which illustrates the collected plant and lists its collectors, collection location, and collection date. While this information is valuable in itself, it also provides context to the specimen and allows an observer to make meaningful comparisons between them. For example, one could consider how the differences in flower structure between these two entries might relate to the unique habitat characteristics associated with their collection locations, as P. lapathifolium is considered native to both Europe and North America.
Contrastingly, specimens in a botanical garden are documented collections of living plants for research, conservation, display, and education. It seems reasonable to assume that Eriogonum grande var. rubescens, which is native and endemic to California, was grown in the botanical garden or otherwise obtained from another location in the state. While specific collection information is not disclosed, inferences can be made as above on the basis of its habitat, for example. Although there seem to be considerable differences between the structures and habitats of Eriogonum grande var. rubescens and P. lapathifolium, this could plausibly reflect their growth needs and how they are met by different environments (California and Europe/Asia, respectively).
These differences are also observed in terms of these species’ medicinal potential. There are many publications, both historical and modern, detailing the healing properties of P. lapathifolium; the entire plant itself has been claimed as an antiseptic and astringent, while specific extracts of the plant have been shown to have antioxidant or anti-inflammatory activity. However, there seems to be a lack of information in the literature regarding such properties of Eriogonum grande var. rubescens. While there are confirmed modern-day uses of the plant for gardening purposes and conservation biological control — given its provision of nectar, foliage, and seeds as food for pollinators, birds, and small mammals - information pertaining to its specific historical uses in Materia Medica sources is lacking (Gold Rush Nursery). Nevertheless, historical records depicting the various uses of other California buckwheats (Eriogonum genus) are available, including a decoction of roots commonly used by the Costanoan Indians as a remedy for colds and coughs. Thus, it is highly probable that these uses can be similarly applied to Eriogonum grande var. rubescens.Works Cited
Brandbyge, J. 1993. "Polygonaceae". pages 531-544. In: Klaus Kubitzki (editor); Jens G. Rohwer, and Volker Bittrich (volume editors). The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants volume II. Springer-Verlag: Berlin; Heidelberg, Germany ISBN 978-3-540-55509-4 (Berlin) ISBN 978-0-387-55509-6 (New York)
CCH2, LA00640961.Gold Rush Nursery. “Gold Rush Nursery.” Eriogonum Grande Var. Rubescens Red Buckwheat, Rosy Buckwheat from Gold Rush Nursery, Gold Rush Nursery, https://www.goldrushnursery.com/plant/Eriogonum-grande-var-rubescens.
Manandhar, Narayan P. and Sanjay Manandhar. 2002. Plants and People of Nepal. Portland, Or: Timber Press.
Moerman, Daniel E. 1998. Native American Ethnobotany. Portland, Oregon: Timber Press.
Seimandi, Gisela, Norma Álvarez, María Inés Stegmayer, Laura Fernández, Verónica Ruiz, María Alejandra Favaro, and Marcos Derita. 2021. “An Update on Phytochemicals and Pharmacological Activities of the Genus Persicaria and Polygonum.” Molecules, 26, 5956. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195956
Stuart, George Arthur and Smith, Frederick Porter. 1976. Chinese Materia Medica : Vegetable Kingdom, 342. Taipei: Southern Materials Center.
Wellcome Collection. n.d. "Five flowering plants, including water pepper (Polygonum hydropiper) and redleg (Polygonum persicaria). Chromolithograph by W. Dickes & co., c. 1855." Accessed January 28, 2022. -
1
media/435900.jpg
2022-02-23T11:28:47-08:00
Precious Polygonaceae: Insight into the Historical Collection and Therapeutic Uses of Polygonum, Eriogonum, and Rumex Genera
26
This comparative analysis took to exploring six species under the Polygonaceae plant family, half of which are housed in the UCLA Herbarium and half of which are located in the Mildred E. Mathias Botanical Garden at UCLA. Although they shared a meaningful commonality, these plants fell under a total of three genuses, which seems to explain their differences in morphology - as observed in the physical herbarium specimen sheets and the botanical garden visit - and utility, as unveiled by various Materia Medica entries. However, with an understanding of both historical and modern collection processes, this analysis also postulated that such differences could relate to how these plants were collected and their associated metadata. - By Moryel Yashar, Lexie Baughman, Nicole Cohen, Yair Tabibi, Tabetha Sanchez, and Leah Tabibi
structured_gallery
2022-03-13T22:53:07-07:00
Thought to have originated in 1771, Materia Medica roughly translates to “healing stuff.” While a less than eloquent expression, the value Materia Medica holds is enormous. Complemented by the element of “practice,” more contemporarily referred to as clinical pharmacology, the records contained in Materia Medica represent a collection or knowledge of therapeutic substances, both medical and medicinal, that originated from natural resources. More broadly, this practice emphasizes the value of ethnobotany, which has and continues to serve as a reservoir of priceless information that may contribute to the betterment of health and society. This is the case for the plant family Polygonaceae; Materia Medica entries of the flowering plants have described versatile uses of their various individual structural components – roots, stems, leaves, seeds, and flowers - and the entire plants themselves. Thus, a comparative analysis of a selection of species within this family - Polygonum lapathifolium, Eriogonum grande var. rubescens, Eriogonum umbellatum var. umbellatum torr., Eriogonum giganteum var. compactum, Rumex acetosella, and Eriogonum cinereum - demonstrates their diversity in terms of utility and structural features, despite their commonalities in overall morphology and lineage.
While Materia Medica highlights the utility of plants and how humans can rely on nature, it is also important to consider the processes that led to these plants being documented in this manner. The value of these entries in part lies in their collection processes, especially in the sense of knowing their collection details. Such information often includes the collector, collection location, and collection date, alongside detailing the collected specimen itself. As evidenced by Materia Medica, there was clear importance to this information that has stood the test of time. This is especially true in terms of herbaria, or collections of preserved plants. There are about 3,100 herbaria worldwide, with 390 million specimens contained in them. Though impressive, these specimens only hold value if they detail what was collected, where it was collected, when it was collected, and who collected it. This process has become pretty standardized in herbaria, as exemplified on the physical specimen sheet of Eriogonum umbellatum var. umbellatum. All specimens in the UCLA Herbarium contain a similar label, which lists the aforementioned collection details. There may even be additional information, such as the elevation or location coordinates. Having this information gives these specimens ecological and evolutionary value, which can certainly complement their medicinal value. In this way, it allows viewers to make comparisons, whether in terms of the collected information itself or the broader context of the plant.
As such, an integration of information derived from various sources of Materia Medica, preserved herbarium specimen sheets, and living botanical garden specimens gives way toward attaining a more holistic understanding of the plant family Polygonaceae. Each page within this section analyzes three specimens: one from the UCLA Herbarium, one from the Mildred E. Mathias Botanical Garden, and one from a relevant piece of Materia Medica. In order, these pages considered Polygonum lapathifolium and Eriogonum grande var. rubescens; Eriogonum umbellatum var. umbellatum torr. and Eriogonum giganteum var. compactum; and Rumex acetosella and Eriogonum cinereum. While all of these specimens fall under the Polygonaceae family, there are clear differences in their form - dried, alive, and illustrated, respectively - and often more nuanced differences in their representation. The analyses generally compare the collection information and morphological details of the plants and go on to situate these comparisons in a historical context. Specifically, it was of interest to consider why such differences may exist. For example, between the P. lapathifolium herbarium specimen and Materia Medica entry, there were differences in flower structure. Using the collection information, one can consider how this discrepancy may relate to their nativity, for example.
Comparisons like these can also be drawn between this whole collection of plants. As mentioned previously, all of the plants in this section fall under the same family - Polygonaceae - giving them a meaningful commonality that can serve as a basis for their comparison. Interestingly, in the last comprehensive revision of this plant family published in 1993, the family was divided into two subfamilies, namely Eriogonoideae and Polygonoideae, on the basis of earlier systems of plant classification (Brandbyge, 1993). While the circumscriptions of these two subfamilies have since been changed in light of phylogenetic studies of DNA sequences, the Eriogonum, Polygonum, and Rumex genera have maintained their position on the Polygonaceae phylogenetic tree. Such a tree shows each of these genera to branch from a separate node, indicating their evolutionary distance from each other.
This evolutionary distance is reflected in their morphology: looking between the three originally assigned plants, one can quickly point to many differences between them. Just one example of this is in the leaves, which vary in shape, size, and distribution. The leaves of P. lapathifolium are large and tear-drop-shaped with several visible veins; those of Eriogonum umbellatum var. umbellatum are small and rounded, with inconspicuous veins; and those of R. acetosella are small, skinny, and long. This variation is also observed in terms of their medicinal potential. For example, the E. umbellatum plant has historically been utilized by Native American tribes to treat sores, pains, and upset stomachs, among other ailments; R. acetosella is known for its treatment of inflammation and pain; and P. lapathifolium as a whole has been employed in an antiseptic fashion, with specific portions of the plant associated with antioxidant or anti-inflammatory activity. Just as before, one can consider the collection processes or collection details of these plants and how they may be responsible for their differences, which are largely expected, since the plants each fall under a different genus.
From synthesizing this information and analyzing the plants in this way, one can appreciate the significant diversity that exists within a single plant family. Even more significant, this diversity extends beyond first glance, to these plants’ collection processes and utility in society. To have this realization is to see the immense value in these practices that has been known for centuries.