P. lapathifolium Herbarium Specimen
1 media/Physical Herbarium Specimen Sheet_thumb.jpg 2022-03-04T11:34:06-08:00 Moryel Yashar 10371b80dc53ee92566a2fccaf1cc9fa6abf3407 40021 2 Source: UCLA Herbarium plain 2022-03-08T16:49:12-08:00 20210922 105839 UCLA Herbarium - funded by the National Science Foundation award number 1802199 20210922 105839 Lexie Baughman 8e25a77aa976a9ae7f3f53b2f31421fb9623fd7eThis page is referenced by:
-
1
media/435900.jpg
2022-02-23T11:28:47-08:00
Precious Polygonaceae: Insight into the Historical Collection and Therapeutic Uses of Polygonum, Eriogonum, and Rumex Genera
17
In this Scalar page, we explored a total of six species under the Polygonaceae plant family, with half being the originally assigned specimens and half being closely related specimens housed in the UCLA Mildred E. Mathias Botanical Garden. Using the skills and knowledge gained throughout our course, Materia Medica, Pharmacology and Bioprospecting, we engaged in collection-based research to analyze the context in which these plants were collected, their medicinal uses, and the relationships among them. This exploration of the similarities and differences of a number of Polygonaceae plants in various forms will act as an application of the information literacy and collective analysis techniques and, in doing so, will illustrate their value. - By Moryel Yashar, Lexie Baughman, Nicole Cohen, Yair Tabibi, Tabetha Sanchez, and Leah Tabibi
structured_gallery
2022-03-09T14:20:06-08:00
Introduce materia medica - notes/references from someone.
“All of the plants presented in these analyses fall under the same family - Polygonaceae - giving them a meaningful commonality that can serve as a basis for their comparison. Polygonaceae has been important to…” Discuss how this fits into the context of materia medica - notes/references from someone.
While materia medica highlights the utility of plants and how humans can rely on nature, it is also important to consider the processes that led to these plants being documented in this manner. The value of these entries in part lies in their collection processes, especially in the sense of knowing their collection details. Such information often includes the collector, collection location, and collection date, alongside detailing the collected specimen itself. An example of this is seen in the materia medica entry of Polygonum lapathifolium, which was made by William Dickes and Anne Pratt in 1855. Even over a century ago, there was clear importance to this information, and this value has stood the test of time. This is especially true in terms of herbaria, or collections of preserved plants. There are about 3.100 herbaria worldwide, with 390 million specimens contained in them. Though impressive, these specimens only hold value if they detail what was collected, where it was collected, when it was collected, and who collected it. This process has become pretty standardized in herbaria, as exemplified on the physical specimen sheet of Eriogonum umbellatum var. umbellatum Torr. All specimens in the UCLA Herbarium contain a similar label, which lists the aforementioned collection details. There may even be additional information, such as the elevation or location coordinates. Having this information gives these specimens ecological and evolutionary value, which can certainly complement their medicinal value. In this way, it allows viewers to make comparisons, whether in terms of the collected information itself or the broader context of the plant.
Such comparisons are what inspire the individual content pages of this section. Each author pair analyzed three specimens: one from the UCLA Herbarium, one from the Mildred E. Mathias Botanical Garden, and one from their choice of materia medica. In order, these pages considered Polygonum lapathifolium and Eriogonum grande var. Rubescens; Eriogonum umbellatum var. umbellatum torr. and Eriogonum giganteum var. Compactum; and Rumex acetosella and Eriogonum cinereum. While all of these specimens fall under the Polygonaceae family, there are clear differences in their form - dried, alive, and illustrated, respectively - and perhaps more nuanced differences in their representation. The analyses generally compare the collection information and morphological details of the plants and go on to situate these comparisons in a historical context. Specifically, it was of interest to consider why such differences may exist. For example, between the P. lapathifolium herbarium specimen and materia medica entry there were differences in flower structure. Using the collection information, one can consider how this discrepancy may relate to their collection locations or even their nativity.
Comparisons like these can also be drawn between this whole collection of plants.