Eriogonum umbellatum var. umbellatum Torr.
1 media/cch2 plant_thumb.jpg 2022-02-28T11:20:56-08:00 Yair Tabibi 078fed945287deb72c47d884b791a31f6b31eab5 40021 3 Sulphur-flower buckwheat - The roots, stems, leaves, and flowers of the plant depicted among collected material. plain 2022-03-08T15:44:45-08:00 20210917 141245 UCLA Herbarium - funded by the National Science Foundation award number 1802199 20210917 141245 Nicole Cohen 77b59277f6b2a55cc085a928224030c702d38cf4This page has annotations:
- 1 2022-02-28T11:40:15-08:00 Nicole Cohen 77b59277f6b2a55cc085a928224030c702d38cf4 Roots Nicole Cohen 3 plain 2022-02-28T11:41:38-08:00 Nicole Cohen 77b59277f6b2a55cc085a928224030c702d38cf4
- 1 2022-02-28T11:43:18-08:00 Nicole Cohen 77b59277f6b2a55cc085a928224030c702d38cf4 Small Leaves Nicole Cohen 2 plain 2022-02-28T11:44:01-08:00 Nicole Cohen 77b59277f6b2a55cc085a928224030c702d38cf4
- 1 2022-03-08T14:51:18-08:00 Nicole Cohen 77b59277f6b2a55cc085a928224030c702d38cf4 Collection Information Nicole Cohen 2 plain 2022-03-08T14:52:17-08:00 Nicole Cohen 77b59277f6b2a55cc085a928224030c702d38cf4
- 1 2022-03-08T14:52:44-08:00 Nicole Cohen 77b59277f6b2a55cc085a928224030c702d38cf4 Flower of E. umbellatum Nicole Cohen 2 plain 2022-03-08T14:54:21-08:00 Nicole Cohen 77b59277f6b2a55cc085a928224030c702d38cf4
- 1 2022-02-28T11:42:18-08:00 Nicole Cohen 77b59277f6b2a55cc085a928224030c702d38cf4 Root Abundance Nicole Cohen 2 plain 2022-02-28T11:42:46-08:00 Nicole Cohen 77b59277f6b2a55cc085a928224030c702d38cf4
This page is referenced by:
-
1
2022-02-16T11:36:36-08:00
Beautiful Buckwheat: Comparisons Between Eriogonum umbellatum var. umbellatum Torr. and Eriogonum giganteum var. compactum
63
This entry examines two plants under the Polygonaceae family, and of the same genus: Eriogonum umbellatum var. umbellatum Torr., and Eriogonum giganteum var. compactum. The former plant is commonly known as sulphur-flower buckwheat and was collected from the UCLA herbarium. The latter plant, known as Santa Barbara Island Buckwheat, was collected from the Mildred E. Mathias Botanical Garden. Comparisons between the two plants are of note and bring to light both similarities and differences within their roots, stems, leaves, and flowers. The two plants are examined from the bottom up, thus prompting inquiry into its individualistic functions and further the potential medicinal and historical uses of the plants. - By Nicole Cohen and Yair Tabibi
plain
2024-12-18T09:45:42-08:00
Eriogonum umbellatum var. umbellatum Torr., a member of the Polygonecae family, is colloquially known as sulphur-flower buckwheat, a common yet significant plant, and commonly ranges from 3-16 inches tall. This plant in particular was collected by G.N. Jones on July 16, 1933. The image of the collected Eriogonum umbellatum var. umbellatum Torr. plant begins with its roots, which are quite extensive, almost half the size of the plant itself. The length and abundance of the roots may indicate that the plant is efficient at absorbing water from the soil. The thinness, yet abundant nature, of the roots may also be an indicator of absorption efficacy.
Furthermore, the abundance of roots, both thick and thin, as well as their length, indicates the potential for the plant's ability to thrive in dry climates, where water is scarce. This plant in particular was collected from the Oregon woods. Its genus counterpart, Eriogonum giganteum var. compactum, was collected from the Mildred E. Mathias Botanical garden on a hill with dry soil in direct sunlight. It stands to reason that E. umbellatum could potentially thrive in similar conditions.
The herbarium plant has many small leaves that branch off from the stem. This may indicate that the plant is prone to sunlight-filled areas. The abundance of leaves would aid in the photosynthesis process, collecting energy from the sun. The plant's leaves dry in brown color, and they are relatively uniform in shape, almost in a tear-dropped or almond-shaped formation. This shape may aid in the function of the plant, either bringing water to the center of the plant or dropping water downwards towards the root. Because the plant was collected from the woods, the function of the leaves could also be a method of preservation, mitigating rainfall or moisture from oversupplying the plant.
Eriogonum giganteum var compactum, also known as Santa Barbara Island Buckwheat, is larger than E. umbellatum, generally ranging between 1.3-3 feet tall. While the plant is larger in terms of size, is very similar to E. umbellatum in terms of the shape and color of its leaves. The light color of the underside of the E. umbellatum leaves differs from its dark surface. The darker color of its surface, while potentially a side effect of drying, could additionally function as an attractant towards sunlight. This aspect of the plant’s leaves is mirrored in the leaves of E. giganteum.
One significant difference between the two plants is revealed in the stems, the herbarium plant containing long, thin stems, while the plant from the botanical garden is thicker, nearly double the size, which may reflect the difference in location climate. Another difference that is present between the two plants emerges from the flowers; E. umbellatum is populated by clustered yellow flowers in the shape of an umbrella, which could be for ease of pollination, while E. giganteum is populated by far less abundant flowers in the shape of small stars. Additionally, E. giganteum flowers do not contain the bright yellow of its counterpart, instead consisting of a dark purple or gray when not in season, and a lighter white color whilst in season.
The materia medica version of our plant, its scientific name being Eriogonum umbellatum Torr, was supplied by the Kew Royal Botanical Gardens, and was collected from the Upper Geyser Basin on Yellowstone Park on August 6, 1897. The plant was collected by P.A. Rydberg and Ernst A. Bessey. The collected buckwheat plant includes stems, leaves, and flowers/inflorescence (with an inflorescence axis). It's form and structure is very similar, almost identical, to the E. umbellatum plant from the UCLA Herbarium, with slight differences apparent within their roots, which can be attributed to differences in collection practice.
In a historical context, the use of the E. umbellatum plant, has been touted by many of the United States Native American tribes, its medicinal usages varying. Tribes in the west of the United States, such as the Klamath, Cheyenne, Kayenta Navajo, among others, use the plants in different forms, but generally in that of a poultice or salve. For example, the Klamath utilized the leaves in a poultice to calm burns, while the Cheyenne utilized the stems and flowers to aid lengthy menstrual cycles in women. The Paiute and Shoshone tribes utilized the leaves and roots as an aid for rheumatism, colds, or pains of the stomach. The Kawaiisu used the flowers in the form of a salve to treat gonorrheal sores. The plant as a whole was used by the Navajo to prompt vomiting in the case of intestinal issues. The historical E. umbellatum plant consists of small, rounded, almond-shaped leaves, with long and thin stems. The top of the plant has yellow bunched flowers varying in quantity from four to nine per plant. The image of the plant is consistent with the depicted properties of E. umbellatum var. umbellatum Torr, our originally researched species from the UCLA herbarium. The modern form of sulphur-flower buckwheat, however, does not appear to be used in contemporary medicines or treatments.WORKS CITED
United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. “Sulphur-Flower Buckwheat (Eriogonum Umbellatum) Plant Guide.” USDA NRCS Lockeford Plant Materials Center. https://www.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_PLANTMATERIALS/publications/capmcpg11382.pdf. -
1
media/435900.jpg
2022-02-23T11:28:47-08:00
Precious Polygonaceae: Insight into the Historical Collection and Therapeutic Uses of Polygonum, Eriogonum, and Rumex Genera
26
This comparative analysis took to exploring six species under the Polygonaceae plant family, half of which are housed in the UCLA Herbarium and half of which are located in the Mildred E. Mathias Botanical Garden at UCLA. Although they shared a meaningful commonality, these plants fell under a total of three genuses, which seems to explain their differences in morphology - as observed in the physical herbarium specimen sheets and the botanical garden visit - and utility, as unveiled by various Materia Medica entries. However, with an understanding of both historical and modern collection processes, this analysis also postulated that such differences could relate to how these plants were collected and their associated metadata. - By Moryel Yashar, Lexie Baughman, Nicole Cohen, Yair Tabibi, Tabetha Sanchez, and Leah Tabibi
structured_gallery
2022-03-13T22:53:07-07:00
Thought to have originated in 1771, Materia Medica roughly translates to “healing stuff.” While a less than eloquent expression, the value Materia Medica holds is enormous. Complemented by the element of “practice,” more contemporarily referred to as clinical pharmacology, the records contained in Materia Medica represent a collection or knowledge of therapeutic substances, both medical and medicinal, that originated from natural resources. More broadly, this practice emphasizes the value of ethnobotany, which has and continues to serve as a reservoir of priceless information that may contribute to the betterment of health and society. This is the case for the plant family Polygonaceae; Materia Medica entries of the flowering plants have described versatile uses of their various individual structural components – roots, stems, leaves, seeds, and flowers - and the entire plants themselves. Thus, a comparative analysis of a selection of species within this family - Polygonum lapathifolium, Eriogonum grande var. rubescens, Eriogonum umbellatum var. umbellatum torr., Eriogonum giganteum var. compactum, Rumex acetosella, and Eriogonum cinereum - demonstrates their diversity in terms of utility and structural features, despite their commonalities in overall morphology and lineage.
While Materia Medica highlights the utility of plants and how humans can rely on nature, it is also important to consider the processes that led to these plants being documented in this manner. The value of these entries in part lies in their collection processes, especially in the sense of knowing their collection details. Such information often includes the collector, collection location, and collection date, alongside detailing the collected specimen itself. As evidenced by Materia Medica, there was clear importance to this information that has stood the test of time. This is especially true in terms of herbaria, or collections of preserved plants. There are about 3,100 herbaria worldwide, with 390 million specimens contained in them. Though impressive, these specimens only hold value if they detail what was collected, where it was collected, when it was collected, and who collected it. This process has become pretty standardized in herbaria, as exemplified on the physical specimen sheet of Eriogonum umbellatum var. umbellatum. All specimens in the UCLA Herbarium contain a similar label, which lists the aforementioned collection details. There may even be additional information, such as the elevation or location coordinates. Having this information gives these specimens ecological and evolutionary value, which can certainly complement their medicinal value. In this way, it allows viewers to make comparisons, whether in terms of the collected information itself or the broader context of the plant.
As such, an integration of information derived from various sources of Materia Medica, preserved herbarium specimen sheets, and living botanical garden specimens gives way toward attaining a more holistic understanding of the plant family Polygonaceae. Each page within this section analyzes three specimens: one from the UCLA Herbarium, one from the Mildred E. Mathias Botanical Garden, and one from a relevant piece of Materia Medica. In order, these pages considered Polygonum lapathifolium and Eriogonum grande var. rubescens; Eriogonum umbellatum var. umbellatum torr. and Eriogonum giganteum var. compactum; and Rumex acetosella and Eriogonum cinereum. While all of these specimens fall under the Polygonaceae family, there are clear differences in their form - dried, alive, and illustrated, respectively - and often more nuanced differences in their representation. The analyses generally compare the collection information and morphological details of the plants and go on to situate these comparisons in a historical context. Specifically, it was of interest to consider why such differences may exist. For example, between the P. lapathifolium herbarium specimen and Materia Medica entry, there were differences in flower structure. Using the collection information, one can consider how this discrepancy may relate to their nativity, for example.
Comparisons like these can also be drawn between this whole collection of plants. As mentioned previously, all of the plants in this section fall under the same family - Polygonaceae - giving them a meaningful commonality that can serve as a basis for their comparison. Interestingly, in the last comprehensive revision of this plant family published in 1993, the family was divided into two subfamilies, namely Eriogonoideae and Polygonoideae, on the basis of earlier systems of plant classification (Brandbyge, 1993). While the circumscriptions of these two subfamilies have since been changed in light of phylogenetic studies of DNA sequences, the Eriogonum, Polygonum, and Rumex genera have maintained their position on the Polygonaceae phylogenetic tree. Such a tree shows each of these genera to branch from a separate node, indicating their evolutionary distance from each other.
This evolutionary distance is reflected in their morphology: looking between the three originally assigned plants, one can quickly point to many differences between them. Just one example of this is in the leaves, which vary in shape, size, and distribution. The leaves of P. lapathifolium are large and tear-drop-shaped with several visible veins; those of Eriogonum umbellatum var. umbellatum are small and rounded, with inconspicuous veins; and those of R. acetosella are small, skinny, and long. This variation is also observed in terms of their medicinal potential. For example, the E. umbellatum plant has historically been utilized by Native American tribes to treat sores, pains, and upset stomachs, among other ailments; R. acetosella is known for its treatment of inflammation and pain; and P. lapathifolium as a whole has been employed in an antiseptic fashion, with specific portions of the plant associated with antioxidant or anti-inflammatory activity. Just as before, one can consider the collection processes or collection details of these plants and how they may be responsible for their differences, which are largely expected, since the plants each fall under a different genus.
From synthesizing this information and analyzing the plants in this way, one can appreciate the significant diversity that exists within a single plant family. Even more significant, this diversity extends beyond first glance, to these plants’ collection processes and utility in society. To have this realization is to see the immense value in these practices that has been known for centuries.