Sign in or register
for additional privileges

FoodWords Draft

Valentine Cadieux, Tahsha LePage, Phoebe Ward, Monica Saralampi, Martha Megarry, Maria Frank, Matt Gunther, Authors

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

Community Garden Social Impact Assessment Toolkit (summary & metadata)

From the Introduction:
This toolkit is designed to help community gardens assess their social impact. Social impact is defined as the benefits and resources that are created or shared because of relationships with in and around a community garden. Community gardens help build different kinds of relationships:
  • Relationships with other gardeners,
  • Relationships in a neighborhood or local community, and
  • Relationships with local organizations such as faith-based communities, neighborhood associations, food shelves, & local businesses.

Through these relationships community gardens offer different kinds of benefits that contribute to a garden’s social impact. Community gardens:

  • Beautify neighborhoods,
  • Provide opportunities for exercise,
  • Increase access to fresh and healthy food,
  • Reduce crime,
  • Break down barriers,
  • Teach people new skills and hobbies, and
  • Build and strengthen relationships.

Why use this toolkit? Community gardens use this tool kit because increasing the social impact of a garden will increase the garden’s sustainability

Quick Facts:
  • Author: Keith Miller
  • Published: 2012, CURA, Univ of Minnesota
  • Intended audience: community garden leaders, gardeners, urban communities, people interested in starting a community garden
  • Goals / purpose: To support community gardens in assessing their social impact.
  • Methods - How would someone know they could trust this?
    • Credible because it has been implemented and has worked, according to the quotes in the toolkit. It can be used with community gardens across the state
  • From 1 (not very well)–4 (very well), how well does this source of food knowledge:
    • Engage an adequate range of perspectives and types of knowledge? (2)
    • Translate between diverse perspectives? (1)
    • Address conflicts across perspectives? (1)
    • Generate useful information for those affected by the issues addressed? (4)
    • Include an adequate range of relevant stakeholders throughout the knowledge-creation process? (2)
    • Help users of this knowledge source learn from each other? (4)
    • Allow users of this knowledge source to put what they learn into action? (4)
    • Consider the larger context as necessary? (3)
  • What is useful, meaningful, surprising, or a problem? Questions?
    • The fact that this toolkit is used to assess the impact of a community garden on a community is important and meaningful, because it's a crucial part of the follow up after a community garden has been established.
  • What do you think could or should be done with this source of knowledge?
  • What has already been done?
  • How should we keep track of what this knowledge does as it circulates in the world?
  • What connections would you like to see made to other information / people / organizations?

See http://www.cura.umn.edu/publications/catalog/npcr-1349 for this and other resources from CURA.

(ID# 1012)
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "Community Garden Social Impact Assessment Toolkit (summary & metadata)"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Real food is Fair., page 4 of 4 Path end, continue

Related:  Models and Strategies for a Produce Distribution Plan (PDF)Minneapolis Community Gardens: A Study of Public Policies in Mpls & Hennepin Co (Metadata)A Guide to Local Food System Planning for Scott County, Minnesota (PDF)Growing Community Resilience: Empowering Neighborhoods with Tools of Design for the Northern Climate (summary & metadata)Facilitating Small Farmer's Access to New Sales Channels in Minnesota: A Transaction Cost Analysis (summary & metadata)Social Capital and Community Gardens: A Literature Review (summary & metadata)Quality of Life and a Sense of Place in Southeast Minnesota (PDF)Social Capital and Community Gardens: A Literature Review (PDF)Review of Community Food Security Literature and Future Directions for Addressing Community Food Insecurity in North Minneapolis (PDF)Farmers Market Model Research (PDF)Minneapolis Community Gardens: A Study of Public Policies in Minneapolis and Hennepin County (PDF)Review of Community Food Security Literature and Future Directions for Addressing Community Food Insecurity in North Minneapolis (summary & metadata)Growing Community Resilience: Empowering Neighborhoods with Tools of Design for the Northern Climate (Metadata)Social Capital & Community Gardens: A Lit Review (Metadata)Farm-to-School in Central MN (Metadata)A Guide to Local Food System Planning for Scott County, Minnesota (summary & metadata)Community Garden Social Impact Assessment Toolkit (PDF)Agricultural Preservation Precedent Studies (Metadata)The Northside Healthy Eating Project (Metadata)Facilitating Small Farmer's Access to New Sales Channels in Minnesota: A Transaction Cost Analysis (PDF)Community Garden Social Impact Assessment Toolkit (metadata)Growing Community Resilience: Empowering Neighborhoods with Tools of Design for the Northern Climate (PDF)Farm-to-School in Central Minnesota - Applied Economic Analysis (PDF)Review of Community Food Security Lit & Future Directions for Addressing Community Food Insecurity in N Mpls (Metadata)Agricultural Preservation Precedent Studies (PDF)Quality of Life and a Sense of Place in Southeast Minnesota (summary & metadata)Farmers Market Model Research (Metadata)Farm-to-School in Central Minnesota - Applied Economic Analysis (summary & metadata)C-G-B School Greenhouse (PDF)Farmers Market Model Research (summary & metadata)The Northside Healthy Eating Project: Transportation Access to Affordable Fresh Produce (PDF)A Guide to Local Food System Planning for Scott County MN (Metadata)