The Metadata of a Digital Archive - Struggling with the Fields
It is difficult to provide all relevant metadata for the archival material without having spent more time with the poet's fonds. Still, I feel the categories provided by Dublin Core are highly applicable to archival material. I can foresee trouble with the "agents" fields however. Photographs may have unidentified creators, or I may have to cross-reference other materials in order to find out who the creators were. Even in the case of the "photoshoot" image, there was no identified photographer, although Brown did provide the name of the studio where the images were developed. I'm still not clear on where the creation of the digitized version is annotated. I wonder if additional metadata should be added to call further attention to the process of digitizing the media. Should this go in the "Contributor" field? Perhaps the process of digitizing doesn't change the content of the resource so much as the form, however certainly form shapes a reader's encounter of the content to some extent. Perhaps I'm not familiar enough with Dublin Core yet, but there doesn't seem to be a field to represent the method by which media shifts take place.
The Metadata of a Digital Archive
Lingering Questions
The Metadata of a Digital Archive
Lingering Questions
Discussion of "The Metadata of a Digital Archive - Struggling with the Fields"
Add your voice to this discussion.
Checking your signed in status ...