Conclusions
Theorists such as Marsha Kinder and Laura Marks have incorporated the neurocognitive approach in some measure. What is, even more than other media, a technology with implications for sensory perception and neural processes, requires an even greater degree of disciplinary interchange. On the side of cognitive neuroscience, studies on touch and sensory perception are extensive, but their applications to virtual reality are speculative and analogous at the moment. On the side of media theory, the arguments lapse all too often into abstraction.
Virtual reality promises to change completely the experience of immersive, sensory-rich media. It is, truly, a transformative technology. As such, it requires innovative scholarship. The introduction centered in large part on the concept of obstruction. Obstruction is not, it should be evident by now, a localized problem in virtual reality or a simple result of the apparatus, but instead virtual reality’s defining feature, its structuring contradiction/condition. Virtual reality verges ever closer to total immersion even as it elucidates elemental divides in the thinking and sensing subject in relation to the world.