The Roots of National Socialism and Germany's Reckoning with its PastMain MenuBy way of introductionThe Context: Germany in the 1920s and Early 1930sAnd into this context there stepped one man . . .Anti-Semitism was Central to Nazi PropagandaPopular Sentiment: "At least Hitler isn't a Communist . . ."Nazi Officials Use Propaganda to Win Popular SupportNazis Pretend Life Goes on as Usual, Even in WarOne of Six Million Jews Slaughtered by the Nazis: Edith SteinWhat Psychologists Say about the Roots of NazismJung's 1946 Essay "After the Catastrophe"Germany's Reckoning with its PastSome Provisional ConclusionsWorks CitedCreative Commons LicenseCathy Kroll0c0427ebd621fb54b22b23c07748d7202fcfe9c8
Carl G. Jung
12017-09-12T09:03:43-07:00Cathy Kroll0c0427ebd621fb54b22b23c07748d7202fcfe9c8222701Ortsmuseum Zollikon. Public Domain. Wikimedia Commons.plain2017-09-12T09:03:44-07:00Cathy Kroll0c0427ebd621fb54b22b23c07748d7202fcfe9c8
This page is referenced by:
12017-09-04T22:27:36-07:00What Psychologists Say about the Roots of Nazism11plain2018-02-13T17:06:59-08:00Carl Jung, one of the most prominent psychologists of the twentieth century, writes from the point of view of a Swiss intellectual and clinician, trying to understand the dark "shadow self" that possessed Hitler and his fellow Nazi officials to devise the so-called "final solution."
In “The Fight with the Shadow" (1946), Jung recalls that he saw evidence of dark forces flooding the “conscious world”: “As early as 1918, I noticed peculiar disturbances in the unconscious of my German patients which could not be ascribed to their personal psychology. . . . There was a disturbance of the collective unconscious in every single one of my German patients. . . . The archetypes I had observed expressed primitivity, violence, and cruelty. When I had seen enough of such cases, I turned my attention to the peculiar state of mind then prevailing in Germany. I could only see signs of depression and a great restlessness, but this did not allay my suspicions. In a paper which I published at that time, I suggested that the ‘blond beast’ was stirring in an uneasy slumber and that an outburst was not impossible. . . . The onslaught of primitive forces was more or less universal. The only difference lay in the German mentality itself, which proved to be more susceptible because of the marked proneness of the Germans to mass psychology.Moreover, defeat and social disaster [of World War I] had increased the herd instinct in Germany, so that it became more and more probable that Germany would be the first victim among the Western nations—victim of a mass movement brought about by an upheaval of forces lying dormant in the unconscious, ready to break through all moral barriers" (219).
". . . the tide that rose in the unconscious after the first World War was reflected in individual dreams, in the form of collective, mythological symbols which expressed primitivity, violence, cruelty: in short, all the powers of darkness. When such symbols occur in a large number of individuals and are not understood, they begin to draw these individuals together as if by magnetic force, and thus a mob is formed. Its leader will be found in the individual who has the least resistance, the least sense of responsibility and, because of his inferiority, the greatest will to power. He will let loose everything that is ready to burst forth, and the mob will follow with the irresistible force of an avalanche” (220).