The Apology: A close reading on political apologiesMain MenuTHE APOLOGYA close reading on todays political apologiesTrump's public apologyIntroductionThe art of the political apologyAnalyzing the objective of the political apologyImage repair theoryThe real objective of Trump's apologyWhat's the medium?History of the political apologyReview of where we have seen the public apology from american politicians beforeIt's not a craft, it's sincerityWhat an apology should beResponses to Trump's apologyTrump triumphsSomehow, people still voted Trump for presidentAvoiding this outcome in the future—How to become a critical thinkerThink twice about the messageWorks CitedDelaney Steeldc902622a29da2820197bfff1ad87b69a6164312Delaney Steel
Critical Thinking
12017-04-12T19:50:09-07:00Delaney Steeldc902622a29da2820197bfff1ad87b69a6164312168361Image from http://thecollaboratory.wdfiles.com/local--files/philosophy-of-thought-and-logic-2011-2012/critical_thinking_skills.jpg CC BY-SA.plain2017-04-12T19:50:09-07:00Delaney Steeldc902622a29da2820197bfff1ad87b69a6164312
This analysis isn't going to offer any answers for how to know when someone is sincere and making a true apology, but I will leave some recommendations on how to become a critical thinker. Celuch, Kozlenkova and Black explain that being a critical thinker involves a purposeful, self-regulatory process that results in reasoned judgment (255). They say that these critical thinking skills include: analysis, inference, explanation, evaluation, self-regulation, and interpretation (256).
By being more cautious and analytical, we can decipher the real meanings in a message. For example, when analyzing Trump's apology, I considered the relevancy and timing, what medium was used, what participants were involved, and what was actually said. I then compared Trump's apology to other American public apologies that were made by previous well-known politicians, and evaluated what we know an apology should be like.
Not only can we then avoid making bad judgments in the future, but critical thinking helps us decide proper responses that are more ethical and thoughtful. If there were more Americans who could properly recognize Trump's dishonesty and see how ridiculous his claims are, America would likely have elected a leader whose goal was to make social advances for everyone.