This site requires Javascript to be turned on. Please enable Javascript and reload the page.

Reading Nature, Observing Science: Examining Material Practices in the Lick Observatory Archives and Kenneth S. Norris Papers

Velvet Case 1

This case contains a chest of slides from Norris's slide collection, along with a handwritten inventory. The slides in this case document various species of lizards, snakes, frogs, and toads, as well as desert habitats. However, the slides themselves do not actually correspond to the titles on the inventory. As the majority of these slides are dated 1948, they are representative of Norris's work in desert ecology during his studies at UCLA.

This page has paths:

Contents of this path:
2. Velvet Case 1 This case contains a chest of slides from Norris's slide collection, along with a handwritten inventory. The slides in this case document various species of lizards, snakes, frogs, and toads, as well as desert habitats. However, the slides themselves do not actually correspond to the titles on the inventory. As the majority of these slides are dated 1948, they are representative of Norris's work in desert ecology during his studies at UCLA.
6. Kenneth S. Norris: Natural History Field Quarter
7. Kenneth S. Norris: Echolocation
8. Case 5: Illustrating the Cosmos The images on the top shelf of case 5 display a selection of astronomical illustrations from the Lick Observatory archives. Notably, the archives contain sketches and correspondence from famous astronomical illustrator Étienne Trouvelot. Did the ideas and images offered by artists like Trouvelot have an impact on the way astronomers at the Lick perceived the cosmos? Can astronomical illustrations count as factual data? When observing the cosmos, can objectivity be disentangled from aesthetic experience? Click the above link to read more about this topic.
9. Case 5: Photographing the Cosmos The middle and bottom shelves of case 5 display documents, images, and objects related to the early astrophotographic work of the Lick Observatory. Is it possible to obtain "objective" representations of celestial objects like galaxies and nebula when their details are invisible even in the telescope? How were Lick astronomers' ideas about the objectivity of the camera filtered through the aesthetic concern to produce visually stunning photographs? How is our idea of the reality of the cosmos--then, as now--a matter of aesthetic expectations created by certain standards and conventions of representation? Click the above link to read more.

This page has paths:

Contents of this path: