This page has annotations:

1. 1 2019-12-05T07:54:53-08:00 Lindsay Wright 43a99ec7d54d1be69bca7742bf73aca8e82f68ed 1 Lindsay Wright 3 plain 2019-12-05T08:05:05-08:00 Lindsay Wright 43a99ec7d54d1be69bca7742bf73aca8e82f68ed
2. 1 2019-12-05T07:55:04-08:00 Lindsay Wright 43a99ec7d54d1be69bca7742bf73aca8e82f68ed 2 Lindsay Wright 3 plain 2019-12-05T08:06:01-08:00 Lindsay Wright 43a99ec7d54d1be69bca7742bf73aca8e82f68ed
3. 1 2019-12-05T07:55:19-08:00 Lindsay Wright 43a99ec7d54d1be69bca7742bf73aca8e82f68ed 3 Lindsay Wright 3 plain 2019-12-05T08:07:00-08:00 Lindsay Wright 43a99ec7d54d1be69bca7742bf73aca8e82f68ed
4. 1 2019-12-05T08:00:20-08:00 Lindsay Wright 43a99ec7d54d1be69bca7742bf73aca8e82f68ed 4 Lindsay Wright 3 plain 2019-12-05T08:07:01-08:00 Lindsay Wright 43a99ec7d54d1be69bca7742bf73aca8e82f68ed

This page is referenced by:

• 1 2019-05-29T13:25:34-07:00 View of the Arch of Titus (2 of 2) 19 Veduta dell’Arco di Tito plain 2022-07-18T13:21:56-07:00 Title: Veduta dell’Arco di Tito Key: 1. Villa Farnese. 2. Avanzi del Tempio detto di Giove Statore. 3. Monte Capitolino. 4. Ruine del Tempio detto della Pace. Signature: Cavalier Piranesi del(ineavit). e inc(idit). Title: View of the Arch of Titus. Key: 1. Villa Farnese. 2. Ruins of the Temple, called the Temple of Jupiter Stator. 3. Capitoline Hill. 4. Ruins of the Temple, called the Temple of Peace. Signature: Designed and engraved by the Knight Piranesi. Through dramatic chiaroscuro, Piranesi imbues this majestic yet decaying symbol of Imperial triumph with a heightened theatricality. This view of the façade of the Arch of Titus is in fact all about stark contrasts, enhanced by Piranesi’s use of lighting effects, perspective, and gesture. The dark and rough hatching of the arch’s stone and inscription pushes the monument into the foreground and provides a jarring foil to the ancient ruins that recede into the soft, hazy, and ethereal light of the Forum in the background. Rendered in a dark, almost completely black ink, the curve of the arch as well as the sharp diagonal of the buttress on the left seem hollowed out by the light and texture of the paper. Barbara Maria Stafford has likened Piranesi’s images to archaeological dissections; here, the buttress in particular looks as though it has been surgically cut, almost dissected, to expose the rough-cut stone of the base (1991, 57-66). This exposed block, like a muscle or vein, hosts a shadowy actor, whose dramatic gesture creates another compositional axis.
  
  Diagonals created by gesturing figures in addition to alternating blocks of light and shadow create not only clear compositional boundaries but also stylistic and topographical divisions. The crisp precision of the virtually pristine sixteenth-century Farnese Palace on the left, the first item in the numbered key, is juxtaposed with the deteriorated and fragmented state of the ruins. Such stylistic differences draw a distinction between the ancient and modern topography of the Forum. The perspective is skewed such that viewers can see, through the central arch, the remains of what Piranesi attributed as the Golden House of Nero (now identified as the Basilica of Maxentius). The artist asserted that the monument, along with the Arch of Titus, formed the ancient boundary of the Forum which extended toward the foot of the Capitoline Hill, an argument he makes both verbally, in the third annotation here, and visually, in an earlier view of the arch. Compared to the previous image, this etching boasts an enhanced sublime and dramatic style, perhaps an appeal to the taste of grand tourists, while it also expands, through Piranesi’s characteristic inclusion of archeological argument, the genre of the veduta. (ZL) 
  
  To see this image in the Vedute di Roma, volume 17 of Piranesi’s Opere, click here.