Piazza d'Oro, close-up1 media/PiazzadOrocloseup_thumb.jpg 2020-05-11T06:39:08-07:00 Jeanne Britton e120651dde677d5cf1fd515358b14d86eb289f11 22849 1 plain 2020-05-11T06:39:08-07:00 OS14000_A0 #54241 Jeanne Britton e120651dde677d5cf1fd515358b14d86eb289f11
This page is referenced by:
View of the Piazza d’Oro in Hadrian's Villa
Veduta degli Avanzi della Circonferenza delle antiche Fabbriche di una delle Piazze della Villa Adriana oggidi chiamata Piazza d’oro
Title: VEDUTA degli Avanzi della Circonferenza delle antiche Fabbriche di una delle Piazze della Villa Adriana oggidi chiamata Piazza d’oro Signature: Cav(alier). Piranesi F(ecit).
Title: View of the Ruins of the Outer Boundaries of the ancient Buildings of one of the Piazzas of Hadrian’s Villa, today called the Golden Court. Signature: Made by the Knight Piranesi.
The title of this view of ruins specifies their original and contemporary name—the Piazza of Hadrian’s Villa, now called the Golden Court (Piazza d’oro)—a site, like Tivoli in general, associated with luxury. This print, like many of Piranesi’s views of ruins, has two opposing visual effects: it invites and repels viewers with, on one hand, a sharp diagonal line that draws a viewer’s eyes towards the horizon and, on the other, a foreshortened middle ground that thwarts any imaginative entry into the image (Vershaffel). In this view, there are two diagonal lines. The most prominent is the interrupted diagonal line of the three ruined buildings, moving from the upper left to the far right of the image, and it finds a double in the diagonal line linking three human figures, staggered from the caption in the foreground to the dark interior in the background. Each of the human figures gestures left, towards the ruins. These human figures have been said to serve many purposes across Piranesi’s works. They can establish and exaggerate scale, provide documentary evidence of eighteenth-century Roman life, suggest pervasive decay (Hyatt Mayor 16), hinder identification (Verschaffel), resemble “human insects” (Yourcenar 102), gesture towards a monument, gesticulate towards nothing in particular (Wilton-Ely 1994, 361), or, by pointing to an image’s caption or title, amplify its “deictic power” (Stewart 172). The human beings depicted in this single view perform different actions and produce varied, opposing effects. In the foreground, two men gesture, one pointing to the structure with both arms, his palms facing upwards, while the other leans down and points to, and into, the image’s caption. A second man along the diagonal of human figures also points at a section of the ruined palace while leaning against a lump of stone. The diagonal ends in the third mass, where a white, ghostly figure barely emerges from the shadow of a partial interior. He, too, gestures to the left of the image.
If the diagonal of the structures draws the viewer’s eye towards the horizon, the second diagonal of the human beings, especially at its origin in the foreground, impedes a viewer’s imaginative entry into the image. The three gestures, all pointing in the same direction, nevertheless direct a viewer’s eye towards the ruins. The structure’s modern name, as specified in the engraving’s title, marks a linguistic gap that adds to the sense of historical distance and physical decay. Perhaps this image’s conflicting visual guides—the diagonal lines, the gesturing figures—point towards the inaccessibility of the luxury and glory associated with ruins that, even though they can be observed and documented, remain out of reach. (JB)
To see this image in the Vedute di Roma, volume 17 of Piranesi’s Opere, click here.