From those working on the NUI, we find that it is an “interface
that is effectively invisible, or becomes invisible to its user with
successive learned interactions,” and that natural is defined as “organic,
unthinking, prompted by instinct.” Claims that ubicomp related
interfaces are more “natural” for “human beings” are echoed
even by independent writers unaffihiated with any particular
company or research group: “Human beings are physical
creatures; we like to interact directly with objects. We’re
simply wired this way. Interactive gestures allow users to interact
naturally with digital objects in a physical way, like we
do with physical objects.”
-Lori Emerson, "“Indistinguishable from Magic: Invisible Interfaces and Digital Literature as Demystifier”
From the MIT research group working on the Fluid UI, we
are told their aim is to make “the user experience more seam
less, natural and integrated in our physical lives” by creating
interfaces that “perceive the user, her current context and
actions and offer relevant services and information based on that
awareness.” From the designers of the OUI, we read about a
wondrous world populated by computers “with displays that
are curved, flexible and that may even change their own shape
in order to better fit the data, or user for that matter.”
-Lori Emerson, "“Indistinguishable from Magic: Invisible Interfaces and Digital Literature as Demystifier”