Micro-Landscapes of the Anthropocene

"Our present moment as a petrified past to come..."

On reading Thomas H. Ford's Aura in the Anthropocene I became very interested in the temporal frameworks that characterise the Anthropocene. Ford writes that the Anthropocene "requires cross-comparison of the fossil record with the present day, in an effort to read the unceasing flux of our current moment as a petrified past to come". Anthropogenic anxiety folds past, present, and future temporalities all into the one inescapable, imminent-yet-not-actualised crisis which we imagine from a post-apocalyptic (future) vantage point.

Repeated images of the plant-festered, human-less city; alienating quotidian artefacts by imagining what future historians would say about them; equally wanting and not-wanting to have kids; Pompeii 2.0: this time it's everything.

Time, as experienced in the context of the Anthropocene, acts as both executor and saviour. "The time has passed", yet "we still have some time".

Linked Readings

Capitalism & Time

Temporalities - Russell West-Pavov [ch. 6: Economics]

Battery icons shape perceptions of time and pace and define user identities - City University London

How capitalism killed sleep - Laura Gasciogne

One Year Performance 1980-1981 (Time Clock Piece) - Tehching Hsieh

Folding Time, Queering Time

The Autonomy of Affect - Brian Massumi

Which Way is Tomorrow?

Fumé - Sarah Rodigari

Black Quantum Futurism - Rasheedah Phillips

Genesis 1:1 - 2:3

A Prayer for Time

Time is the Thing a Body Moves Through - T Fleischmann [excerpt]

3 Images; 3 Texts






1. Trees gather time as thickness. Thick time enmeshes temporalities, viewing time as something to be involved with rather than something to linearly traipse. A co-operative participation, rather than a unit of measure. Spatio-temporal language is no mere conflation: it encourages the understanding that time acts on and with an event just as space does. To point to a tree ring and say "this is where it happened" is to understand that an event in time has not passed just as a location cannot pass. Both flux, of course; but the past, present, and future are simply delineations based on an anthropocentric point of view. Front and back, here and there, now and then. Trees, like all of us, carry and continue their past into the future.

2. The overgrown building writes life (futurity) into the past. A tree continues its past; the overgrown building is the past continuing. The future, for both, is folded into past and present. As the tree's rings brings the past physically into the future, the overgrown building brings the future into the past by reimagining a building's subject. Who is the building for? Who can the building habit? Who will the building habit, once humans are inevitably gone? Intentionality, when met with temporality (as it must), is always negotiation.

3. When I go for a walk, I do not remember details with the linearity that I would capture if I filmed the entire journey. Though I may recall a footbridge I discover over a tiny stream, I do not remember how many minutes into my walk I was when I crossed it, nor do I necessarily remember if it came before or after I found some spiky green seeds strewn on the side of a small road. Walking (or, generally, moving) is necessarily mediating space-time, immersing one's body in the midst of here, then, there, and now. Moving admits the intra-action of all things by enmeshing time, place, thought and headspace, allowing a meditative non-location of re-decontextualisation that makes possible new connections, alternative points of view, and an experience of thick time.

E-concepts: trans-meditation; medial-tation; "let's do the time [walk] again"; un(t)ravelling; cont(a)inuing; in(tra)habiting; temporavelling

This page has paths:

This page references: