The point [...] is not that anthropocentrism and ecocentrism constitute a binary opposition, and that they are unavoidably at odds with each other [... rather] it is to acknowledge that ecocentrism has become a necessary supplement to our anthropocentrism. (443)
As a conclusive musing then, I cannot help but wonder, what if we substituted the image of Genesis, of origin, with another? What if we substituted the divine with the more-than-human world? Perhaps the (re)writing of the narrative of the anthropocene, by way of the 
