Measuring Prejudice: Race Sciences of the 18-19th CenturiesMain MenuMeasuring PrejudiceScientific Racism of the 18th and 19th CenturiesIntroductionTimeline of Racial ScienceTimeline of the History of Scientific RacismPhysiognomyThe Study of Facial Features as a PseudoscienceCraniometryPhrenologyDifferences in Shape and Size of the Skull to Indicate CharacterResources and Citationslinks and sources used in researchSophia Seiberthe2a02a11e04e0c4ec966558f4cf01bfcc2ffeb82Jeremy Yoshiokaa946e0a62ab5df5e651e19feec0ecb4593c7053cDaniel smithefa17be3be40b3a1445277b49cf3ab9e127857ce
1media/nott animals.jpg2017-03-24T22:02:54-07:00One Race or Several Species3plain2017-03-24T22:45:00-07:00Races and their animals by Josiah Nott Samuel Morton's followers, especially Dr Josiah C. Nott and George Gliddon, extended Morton's notion of Polygenism, that different races adhere from different ancestries and races are evolutionarily unrelated. Based on Morton’s craniometry of the different angles and measurements of Caucasians vs Africans skulls, Nott theorized that different races originated from different ancestors. Exemplified by his 1854 catalogue of different human species, Nott put forth the notion that races are distinct biological species because they hybridize unsatisfactorily. He further argued in an article in the American Journal of the Medical Sciences, that mulattos and racially mixed offspring suffer from depressed stature and intelligence. Writing in opposition of allowing whites and blacks to intermarry or any other diverse racial couple for the matter, Nott’s writings influenced the passing of anti-miscegenation laws, banning marriage and sexual encounters between whites and non-whites. He campaign these as promoting scientific, opposed to Biblical explanations of the origins of races. Charles Darwin, the father of evolutionary theory, feverously opposed polygenist evolutionary thinking. Citing the single origin hypothesis as essential to his theory of evolution, Darwin voiced his criticism of Nott and argued for monogenism.