Scalar's 'additional metadata' features have been disabled on this install. Learn more.
Ghost Metropolis: Los Angeles from Clovis to Nixon
Main Menu
Regimes: Ruling the Los Angeles Region from the Late Pleistocene to the 21st Century
Places and Paths of Los Angeles
Manna From Hell: Power and Politics from Region to World Power
Shadows: Visual Cultures and Mass Media of a Regional and Global Power
Segregated Diversity: The Geosocial Formation of Social Justice in the Late Twentieth Century
Richard 37th: Nixon, Los Angeles, and World Power
The American 1989: Los Angeles at the Climax of the 20th Century
Narrative Essay
Bibliographies, Filmographies, Gazeteers, Indexes
Mapping the Past: Theory, Methods, Historiography
Path
Credits
Root
Phil Ethington
e37d40405599cccc3b6330e6c4be064cc03ef7a5
Pico-Whittier Transection, 1940-2000
1 2013-11-24T20:43:59-08:00 Phil Ethington e37d40405599cccc3b6330e6c4be064cc03ef7a5 677 3 Pico-Whittier Transection, 1940-2000. Data by Ethington, Frey, Myers, Park, and Ryu. Analysis, Design, and Cartography by Phil Ethington, 2007. plain 2013-12-11T21:10:51-08:00 Phil Ethington e37d40405599cccc3b6330e6c4be064cc03ef7a5This page has paths:
- 1 2019-06-28T16:22:10-07:00 Phil Ethington e37d40405599cccc3b6330e6c4be064cc03ef7a5 Cartographies of Los Angeles Phil Ethington 5 visual_path 2019-06-28T16:47:16-07:00 Phil Ethington e37d40405599cccc3b6330e6c4be064cc03ef7a5
This page is referenced by:
-
1
media/Transsect_200170709_NoTitle.jpg
2013-11-10T19:09:04-08:00
Arteries of Privilege and Inequality: Pico-Whittier, Lakewood-Rosemead, Sunset, and Sepulveda
45
image_header
2017-08-06T17:27:37-07:00
Los Angeles has always been socially segregated and yet that segregation has always been in motion. There are many ways to be spatially separated, through a myriad of geosocial formations that have taken formal designations of: isolation, concentration, clustering, intermingled, homogeneity, diverse, heterogeneous.
But these differences are themselves always in motion. Each neighborhood changes demographically: at different rates but unceasingly. Motion through this moving metropolis occurs at different scales of spacetime, from the everyday experience of any person, to the lifecycle scale, to intergenerational scales.As we travel through a metropolis, depending on our speed and distance, we encounter (always changing) social differences of myriad types. Race-ethnic and class segregation are two of the most profound, but how are these kinds of segregation experienced by Angelenos? Metropolitans experience residential segregation by driving or riding through the metropolis. If they stayed in one segregated place, they would not experience any difference. It is by crossing boundaries that we experience their meaning and power.We need better ways to see these boundaries in space and time at all scales, and to represent the urban transit as a meaningful unit of analysis. People make time by moving through space, as we see in the Ethington-Flick-Isoyama videos, in which Robbert Flick's automobile video capture is overlaid with the real-time radio broadcast of KFWB, featuring grisly news of war from far-away Iraq. So it is important to shape space and time in the graphic representation of the past, and to imagine the world of lived experience and mediated perception in which urbanites traverse their metropolis.To this end, I devised the “transection,” a cross-section of the metropolis on a single line of transit. The transection is designed to combine rigor with common sense, and to steer the discipline of quantitative analysis away from needless abstraction and toward the path of experience. I extracted every census tract that touches these arteries, and then reordered them to correspond to the path of the artery. I next produced standard spreadsheet graphs of median house value and percent "White Non-Hispanic," and sized those to the exact length of the artery on the transection map. Displayed in twenty-year increment series, these series of charts reveal the long-term (“long” for a rapidly-changing metropolis) patterns across that one cross-section.Arteries
Los Angeles began at Yang-na/La Placita and has grown both eastward and westward ever since. Its deepest arteries run along the footpaths of the Millingstone people and their successors, thousands of years old.Prior to the construction of the freeways, people moved on footpaths, then wagon roads, and paved roads or rails: in automobiles, in buses, or on light rail urban and intercity lines. (Motion Cartography). They still do (alongside their travel on freeways) and still gain their primary impression of neighborhoods from the “surface streets” as Angelenos refer to un-free ways. The greatest "surface" arteries of Los Angeles carry the greatest volume of people and because of the high concentration of people (something measurable by person-meter-seconds in a given space), ground rent is higher than surrounding areas to each side.Pico and Whittier Boulevards have cut a deep path from east to west for centuries. Pico Blvd earned that name as the northern boundary of the rancho of Pío de Jesus Pico, the last Mexican guberdador of Alta California and later a prominent U.S. citizen. Whittier is named for the eastern terminus of a road that served to link Yang-na, La Placita, and Downtown Los Angeles to the south-east, eventually toward San Diego. Whittier, the U.S. city was founded as a Quaker settlement, and named for the Quaker poet, John Greenleaf Whittier. It was the home of future U.S. president Richard Milhaus Nixon.
The freeways introduced a new scale and experience of the metropolis. The elevated or sunken freeway typical of the Los Angeles system is devoid of pedestrians and doorways and windows, creating abstracted landscapes. The LA Freeway system was constructed over a half century, sometimes supplanting arteries that inscribed centuries-old pathways. The Harbor (110) Freeway, running from Downtown Los Angeles to the Port of Los Angeles/Long Beach, super-inscribes the "Very Ancient Road" recorded in the *** map.A street-level transection of the metropolis captures not only the cross-metropolis impressions of commuting and shopping, but also the lived circulation between segregated areas. Mapping ethnic neighborhoods as polygons can mislead the eye and mind to see mainly insularity and division. (There is division, even hostile boundaries, but we need to "see" also the relationships, the sharpness of the transitions, and the overall patterns of interaction).The work of creating a transection begins with choosing an important path through the metropolis. There are many possibilities for each east-west and north-south transit (and of course diagonals are often appropriate). The number of arteries that cut entirely across the county is not unlimited, however, and some arteries have a longer history. Pico and Whittier are attractive because we know that both of these have served as important ways into and out of downtown, since the 19th century. They are also reasonably distant from major freeways, which have typically had a big impact on their surrounding neighborhoods, and which do not afford, as I have said, a sense of place in any given neighborhood (except at the on- and off-ramps).The Pico-Whittier Transection
In 1928, teen-ager Richard "Dickie" Nixon had an important job. His father’s gasoline station and general store, called "The Nixon Market" on Whittier Blvd (at Leffingwell) had a produce stand, and it was 15-year-old Dickie's job to stock it every day before school. For that he rose at 4:00 every morning, drove to the produce market south of Downtown LA, and then return to wash and display the fruits and vegetables before going to school at 8:00 in the morning. His drive took him along Whittier, Blvd north-westward through miles of citrus orchards, and, as Whittier bends due-westward, through Mexican East Los Angeles and Jewish-Mexican Boyle Heights, across the 6th Street Bridge, and down Central Avenue to the Japanese produce markets. Like millions of other Angelenos, he would have had both an integrated and a territorially-segregated sense of the metropolis.Much of the massive and incessant growth of the metropolis has been eastward, into the San Gabriel Valley. Maps from the 1920s show Whittier and a few other urban concentrations dotting a vast plain of farms, orchards and oil wells. By the 1950s those open spaces were rapidly filling up with residential and commercial structures.The durable inscription of social forms is the most striking feature of the Pico-Whittier transection. From 1940 through 2000, a common contour profile is recognizable. From 1960 onward, the basic patterns simply deepen. A rapid fall-off of whites between Beverly Glen and La Cienaga and a rise again between Garfield and Rosemead, rising above the 50% mark nearest to the Orange County line, is quite consistent. Median house values are even more persistently inscribed into the Pico-Whittier path. An important feature to observe is how the median house values dip below the county median line at a point that drifts westward from east of Crenshaw to a point west of Crenshaw over the 60 years charted. There are obvious visual correlations between the two series as well: non-white areas have lower median home values, and the fall-off between La Cienaga and Crenshaw is dramatic in both the race and the house value series. However, the property values show a great deal of independence from the race series, and cannot be reduced to it. In 1940, the entire path was mostly white, and in 1960, most of the path was above the 50% mark, but the basic patterns in property values holds constant into the era when most of the path is majority nonwhite.The Lakewood-Rosemead TransectionThe Lakewood-Rosemead transection provides a south-to-north comparison with Pico-Whittier, taking place in the easter, mostly post-war suburban development. These arteries are much younger than Pico or Whittier. As late as 1927 there was no Lakewood nor Rosemead boulevards, according to the USGS quadrangle series covering the entire county in that decade. By the time of Renée’s 1946 metropolitan map, however, the two arteries are shown in bold lines.
With few exceptions, the City of Los Angeles lies mostly to the west of the Los Angeles River. Eastward from there, one crosses scores of municipalities in a given commute. Lakewood begins at the south in Long Beach, running northward through Lakewood, Bellflower, Paramount, Downy, Pico Rivera, LA County, Rosemead, South El Monte, Temple City, LA County, and ends at the San Gabriel foothills in Pasadena. In 2000, Angelenos making that trip would seven freeways. Such a long commute on surface streets would be very uncommon. The transection does not assume that a commuter take the entire trip. Instead, it allows inspection of the kinds of transitions experience by the millions of travelers along any segment of it.The Lakewood-Rosemead transection is just as remarkable as a record of the deeply-rooted institutions that produce real estate values. Nearly-identical humps and troughs (albeit with different magnitudes) persist across 60 years in most segments of this transaction. Many of the Lakewood-Rosemead transitions align neatly with the municipal boundaries, as at the Lakewood-Bellflower, Bellflower-Paramount, Paramount-Downey, and Downey-Pico-Rivera boundaries. Sharp transitions resume again at the Rosemead-El Monte and Rosemead-Temple City boundaries. At the far north, the LA County-Pasadena transition is dramatic from 1960 through 2000.
By contrast, the race-ethnic transitions from 1960 through 2000 seem much more gradual and less well correlated with the municipal boundaries. Of particular note, however, is the role of unincorporated County territory in providing places of freedom for people of color. Notice how the point of maximum non-white population is in the center of LA County territory Between Pico Rivera and Rosemead in 1960. The nonwhite population increases from that point, spreading north and south along the Rosemead and Lakewood until most of the path is majority nonwhite by 2000. It would be hard to deny the success of the civil rights movement along the Lakewood-Rosemead path, or the ineffectuality of municipal boundaries in maintaining segregation. Pico-Whittier displays a much more pronounced story of continuing racial segregation and a economic correlate in property values.Sepulveda Transection [explication forthcoming] -
1
2018-07-23T21:35:31-07:00
The Contradictory Mayoralty of Tom Bradley in the Age of Reagan, 1973-1993
4
plain
2019-04-08T15:52:23-07:00
Reagan Inauguration of January 1981 encapsulates the two faces of Los Angeles: Disney and Lockheed. LA's Mayor, Tom Bradley, mirrored these two faces of LA. He was a ribbon-cutting figurehead for racial integration, and he was a promoter, booster, and seducer of LA's corporate capitalism. His policies of inviting rapid investment by multinationals fueled a steep increase in wealth segregation just as the barriers to racial segregation in the housing market collapsed. His reliance on his own charm to keep racial peace during a period of rapid demographic change left the city under-equipped to promote security and trust in the city's sprawling, multiracial neighborhoods. And despite his impeccable credentials as a representative of LA's Black neighborhoods, Mayor Bradley backed aggressive, military-crackdown policing. He pledged to get tough on crime during his election campaign, and, while sometimes quarreling with, substantively supported LAPD Chief Daryl Gates throughout his mayoralty. Bradley "aided in the engineering of aggressive anti-gang programs, and pushed for mandatory jail sentence for all violent offenders." (Viator 2012:21)
Tom Bradley is a towering figure in Los Angeles and California politics: both the only African American and the longest-serving (5-term) mayor in Los Angeles history--going back to 1781. After the Watts Rebellion a new coalition of white liberals, blacks, and latinos gathered around Bradley, a tall ex-LAPD officer with a commanding presence, who was elected to the City Council in 1962 and ran for mayor first in 1969, narrowly losing to Sam Yorty, a Nixon loyalist who ran a race-baiting campaign. In the 1973 rematch, Bradley defeated Yorty and remained in office fully two decades until 1993.[11] Bradley ran for Governor of California twice during the Reagan Administration: in 1982 and 1988, each time defeated by Orange County Armenian-American George Dukmeijian. Bradley, witnessed the racist LAPD department from the inside, and learned to operate within it, as he would later navigate the shoals of a racially divided California electorate after the repeal of the Rumford Fair Housing Act by a populist groundswell of white intolerance.
Bradley behaved as though he had single-handedly integrated Los Angeles racially through his support from a winning the coalition of whites, blacks, and Latinos. Rapid increases in the flow of immigrants from Korea, China, the Philippines, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Russia and many other sending countries, created very rapid and also massive changes in neighborhood geographies, changing faces behind the counters of everyday retail shops, generating frictions at schools, as well as resentments about "invasions." Despite frequent news of race tension, Bradley gutted the city's race-relations commission, called the Human Relations Commission, which had been established in 1966, in response to the Watts Rebellion. A major purpose of race relations commissions is to monitor the state of interethnic conflict, and intervene before disputes rise to the level of civil violence. Bradley, by reducing the Human Relations Commission to a nominal staff, without field workers or conflict resolution specialists, effectively turned a blind eye to growing inter-racial conflict. (Ethington and West 1996).
While relatively smug about the city's churning race relations, Bradley presided over the Manhattanization of Downtown LA. During his tenure Los Angeles sprouted scores of new office and hotel towers. Skyscrapers are widely considered both material to and symbolic of a city's global status. Indeed, foreign investors poured billions into the city's downtown real estate, with Japan and Saudi Arabia among the top investors.Note The Reagan military build-up extravagantly enriched Southern California's aerospace sector. From design to production, Los Angeles in the 1980s was abuzz again with the workshops of warcraft. The aerospace workforce was very white, however, so the top salaries and wages typically flowed into peripheral, white communities, skipping over "South Central" LA: the vast area between the LA River and Baldwin Hills, from Downtown to Watts.
During the Bradley years the geography of wealth inequality deepened between the urban core and its peripheries. The Bradley administration's growth machine generated downtown corporate wealth, which also fueled home prices in the wealthy westside communities of Bel-Air, Beverly Hills, Westwood, Santa Monica, and the beach cities (Redondo Beach, Manhattan Beach, El Segundo). Because these places were all mostly white thanks to prior segregation, they now become just as inaccessible to new working-class immigrants because of the steep price curve encountered when traveling north, east, south, or west. Economic geography closely followed racial geography along the white/non-white boundary, with the hillsides and oceansides preserved for white wealth.
The 1984 Los Angeles Summer Olympics epitomized the contradictions of the metropolis in the age of Reagan. Held from July 28-August 12, the 1984 Summer Olympics, were the second to take place in the Coliseum, which had been purpose-built for the 1932 Olympics. Los Angeles was in fact the only city which had offered a bid to hold the 1984 Olympics, because most great cities feared the cost burden. LA's bid rested on infrastructure that was already in place. It's large nearby universities, especially USC and UCLA, had superb sports facilities and housed the athletes while avoiding the costly construction of new venues. Peter Ubberroth, an entrepreneur from the travel sector, organized the first privately-financed Olympics, and in a reversal of previous decades of Olympic hosting, avoided staggering financial loses. Indeed, the LA 1984 Games actually generated a surplus of $250 million. Ubberoth's key innovation was to win major corporate sponsorships, creating an advertising-branding symbiosis between the US Olympic Commission and the nation's largest, most brand-conscious corporations.
It was a grotesaque irony--lost, apparently, on Peter Ubberoth, that fast-food corporations, which mass-produced the most unhealthy on Earth, were sponsoring the healthiest human beings on the same planet. In fact, McDonald's shrewdly associated healthy athletes with high-profit margin, health-destroying fast food products like hamburgers, sugary sodas, lard-soaked deep-fried potatoes, and flash-frozen, homone-loaded ground beef.
Gold medals, the red, white, and blue logo, and corporate profits all went hand-in-hand. "'Without the Soviets, U.S. athletes have done very, very well,'' said Chuck Rubner, a spokesman for McDonald's in Chicago. The Americans have done so well, in fact, that some of McDonald's 6,600 domestic outlets have reportedly run short of Big Macs." As the major TV networks shamelessly displayed the hosting nation's growing "Medal Count," McDonald's spokesman Rubner gushed: "There's been a real gold rush at McDonald's." Note.
The success of the corporate-sponsor strategy also owed a great deal to the tilted playing fields that year. The competition was sadly lopsided toward the United States because the Soviet Union imposed a boycott on its own athletes, in retaliation for President Jimmy Carter's U.S. boycott of the 1980 Moscow Summer Olympics. Lacking its chief competitor, The U.S "medal count" grew dramatically, and the coverage by broadcaster NBC grew increasingly patriotic. Ronald Reagan had already spent three years in the White House cheer-leading American patriotism. These games, in his hometown, were a perfect spectacle that rallied support for the final battles of the Cold War.
Los Angeles in the 1980s was arguably at the height of its golden age, of its fame and concentrated world power. LA in the 1980s also earned its prominence on the world stage from its world leaders (Nixon, Reagan); powerful industrial sectors (media/entertainment; military-aerospace); and effective boosters (Mayor Tom Bradley, reviving the Otis-Chandler / Chamber of Commerce legacy of growth-machine boosterism).
Bradley tragically left the segregated core of LA to the suzerainty of LAPD Chief Gates, who applied a deliberately brutal military occupation style of policing to South LA, setting the standard for policing in neighboring Compton, Long Beach, Huntington Beach, and the Alameda Corridor cities of the white and latino working-class. Bradley served nonstop until 1993, when his popularity finally sank in the aftermath of the Uprising of April 1992. Daryl Gates was forced out by June following the Uprising.
The Bradley years represented a new configuration of power in the United States more generally, as Democratic mayors of African descent achieved a sort of Pyrrhic victory in a nation whose base of power had shifted to the white suburbs. In Detroit, Mayor Coleman Young presided over the white de-population of the city, and Harold Washington achieved the mayoralty of a deeply racially divided Chicago. In each city, the style and power of these mayors differed. In Los Angeles, the city's first black major lacked both the will and the power to directly fire the Chief, despite Gates' repressive and racist leadership of the LAPD.
The negligent irony of the 1984 LA Olympics was that the flaunting of corporate American consumerism took place within hollowing-out of American metropolises, leaving hundreds of thousands of residents who lacked the money to shop and the shopping malls to shop in. The Los Angeles Coliseum had been built for the 1932 Olympics, when its location was still on the outskirts of the urban core. By the 1980s it was the urban core. Bradley agreed with Chief Gates that LA could not afford to have 10,000 gang members surrounding the international crowds, so he authorized a pre-emptive round-up, done without the fanfare of the Opening Day.