Digital Asia and Activism

Can grassroots and mobile activism achieve an improved democracy in India?

Jolley's piece explores the relationship between media and democracy, and mobile phones' capacity to combat inequality. Traditional news media are inaccessible in Chhattisgarh and other parts of rural, central India. Such regions are characterized by low Hindi and English literacy, a lack of basic resources such as plumbing, and being neglected by the state as well as targeted by Maoist insurgency groups. The few powerful elite further marginalize them by monopolizing media news outlets. Swara has addressed this by utilizing a pre-existing and accessible technology in these regions - mobile non-smart phones - and transforming it into a non-traditional news medium in which locals can call in to report on news and listen to news stories. This kind of representative media has empowering implications for these communities, as it helps them begin to overcome state-sponsored monopolies over news media and democratizes the distribution of information.

"An Insignificant Man" delves more into grassroots political activism in India and the role of social media and activist representation. A consistent lack of politician accountability has ignited political activism and the formation of AAP, a political party that uses a more grassroots campaign approach, which proves effective when different media literacy exists and political corruption is rampant. AAP demands democracy, but what exactly is democracy? Arvind Kejriwal, party leader, and the rest of its members grapple with conflicting answers to this question throughout the documentary. We see that the media and social media also serve as political tools for curating the politician’s image. However, they can be used to spread false information, through slandering other parties, as seen with the tampered video of an AAP member allegedly taking a bribe, or even allowing individual politicians a platform to announce unrealistic promises. The documentary itself also seems to be anti-status quo in its form, using a non-traditional format with no talking heads. This allows the audience more room to form their own criticisms and shift their opinions through a critical lens.

-Michelle

This page has paths:

Contents of this path: