Malamud at Oregon State: A Digital Humanities Project

A New Life: Reception History

 

Overview of Project

The reception map is an open-access, interactive tool that provides insight into the relationship between the setting of a regional text and how reviewers from across geographic locations discuss the text’s location. Specifically, this project addresses how the reviewer’s geographic proximity to Oregon State affects the level of specificity the reviewer uses in describing the setting (e.g. A New life is about Corvallis vs. Oregon). By displaying this information spatially, viewers can clearly see geographic trends in how reviewers recognize and name A New Life’s location and potentially conduct statistical analysis.

 

A New Life is the ideal book for a reception map, because the book is heavily focused on location, and because there is a tendency among scholars and readers to draw parallels between Bernard Malamud and Sy Levin, Corvallis and Eastchester, Oregon State and Cascadia College.

 

The reception map is useful for those interested in reception history, literature, and linguistics.

By displaying this information spatially, we hope readers can consider the following questions:

 
  • Is A New Life widely perceived as a regional novel?
  • How might geographic distance from a book’s setting impact its reception?
  • Are newspapers more likely to mention the location of a A New Life if they are closer to Corvallis?
  • Do reviewers more often mention a specific place if the newspaper’s publication city is close to that place?
 

Explanation of Map

Each point on the map represented the city where a review of A New Life was published.The different colors indicate the most specific setting reviewers reference in their reviews of A New Life. Our color coding scheme (in order from most to least specific) is as follows:

 
  • Oregon State - orange
  • Corvallis - blue
  • Oregon - green
  • Pacific Northwest/ Northwest - purple
  • West/Pacific coast - yellow
  • America - red
 

In addition to color-coding the map, we have also coded it by shape.The reviews that mention New York, New York City, or Manhattan are diamonds, while reviews that do not mention New York are pinpoints.

 

You may see more information about each review by clicking on the map pinpoint. This will bring up a photo of the review, along with the name of the newspaper, author, and date. We recommend viewing the map in full-screen and zooming in on big cities, as you can’t see  every pinpoint when zoomed out. If you would like to view the reviews larger, you may also find its corresponding page linked below in the “Contents” section.

 

You may also view different layers of the map, which allow you to filter the points by color You can do this by selecting the swipe button on the top left corner of the map. Each layer is labeled by location (e.g. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, West). There will be a checkmark next to all of the layers. You may check or uncheck as many layers at a time as you like.

If you would like to navigate through the reviews by date of publication, you can also view the Reception Timeline

 

Limitations

Many of the reviews we had hoped to use were too blurry to read. In addition, the reviews in foreign language were translated using Google Translate, so there could be errors in translation. To address this problem, we provided both the original language along with the English translation, so viewers may translate the text themselves if they choose. For the sake of time, we also just transcribed the sentences in the article containing the most specific location.

 

We were also limited by Google Maps. The layers only provide the level of highest specificity. In other words, if a review mentions both Corvallis and Oregon State, it is only color-coded for its mention of Oregon State. This could potentially mislead users to believe that a review didn’t mention a less specific location that is not represented on the map.
 

Looking Forward

The A New Life Reception Map is public and open to users who want to expand on it, by potentially adding more reviews or layers. Since we hope people will add on to this project, we have made our data public on this spreadsheet, and we encourage people to use the data and add to it. You may also view all of our process documents in our Google Drive folder.

 

Some other directions this project could go include:

  • An n-gram of the occurrence of location names in reviews
  • Full transcriptions of reviews that are searchable
  • A map that shows every location mentioned in reviews not just the most specific location

 

Contents of this path:

  1. Albany Democrat-Herald
  2. Birmingham AL Review
  3. Cedar Rapids Gazette
  4. Charlotte Observer
  5. Chattanooga Times
  6. Chicago Sun
  7. Chicago Sunday Tribune
  8. The Cincinnati Inquirer
  9. Columbus Dispatch
  10. Corvallis Gazette Times
  11. Corvallis Gazette Times
  12. The Courier-Journal
  13. The Daily Star (Toronto)
  14. Daily Telegraph and Morning Post
  15. Dan Jacobson Review (New York)
  16. Detroit Review (MI)
  17. Die Leihbucherei Review (German)
  18. Drake Mabry (IA)
  19. Erich Kock Review (German)
  20. Evening Standard
  21. Greensboro News
  22. Guy Savino (NJ)
  23. Herald
  24. Harper's Magazine
  25. Hartford Courant
  26. Indianapolis Times
  27. The Jewish Chronicle
  28. In Jewish Bookland
  29. Larry McMurty (TX)
  30. Lewiston Tribune
  31. Los Angeles Times
  32. Louis Marino (IL)
  33. Milwaukee Journal
  34. New York Post
  35. New York Times
  36. Oakland Tribune
  37. The Observer (English)
  38. The Oregon Journal
  39. Oxford Mail
  40. People's World
  41. Philadelphia Inquirey
  42. Playboy Review
  43. Providence Journal
  44. The Register-Guardian
  45. Richmond Newsleader
  46. Rocky Mountain News
  47. The Sacramento Bee
  48. Seattle Times (1)
  49. Shreveport Times
  50. Silver Lake News
  51. Stephan P. Ryan (PA)
  52. St. Louis Post Dispatch
  53. St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  54. Sunday Telegraph
  55. Sunday Times (UK)
  56. Sükösd Mihál (Hungarian)
  57. San Francisco Examiner
  58. Seattle Times (2)
  59. TIME
  60. The Village Voice
  61. Virginia Quarterly Review
  62. Washington Post
  63. Worchester Telegram