Sign in or register
for additional privileges

The Art of Academic Peer Reviewing

Shalin Hai-Jew, Author
Cover, page 12 of 12

 

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

References


References

Bjork, B-C., Roos, A., & Lauri, M.  (2009).  Scientific journal publishing:  Yearly volume and open access availability.  Information Research:  14(1).  Retrieved August 10, 2014, at http://www.informationr.net/ir/14-1/paper391.html.  

Bohannon, J. (2013). Who’s afraid of peer review. Science: 342(6154), 60 – 65. Retrieved August 10, 2014, at http://www.vn45.com/d/8374/content/342/6154/60.full.

Eisenhart, M. (2002). The paradox of peer review: Admitting too much or allowing too little. Research in Science Education: 32, 241 – 255. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Godlee, F., Gate, C.R., & Martyn, C.N. (1998). Effect on the quality of peer review of blinding reviewers and asking them to sign their reports: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American Medical Association: 280(3), 237 – 240. Retrieved August 10, 2014, at http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=187748.

Jefferson, T., Wager, E., & Davidoff, F. (2002). Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. Journal of the American Medical Association: 287(21), 2786. Retrieved August 10, 2014, at http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=194971.

Mahoney, M.J. (1977). Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research: 1(2), 161 – 175.

Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine: 99(4), 178 – 182. Retrieved August 10, 2014, at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1420798/.

Van Noorden, R. (2014). Publishers withdraw more than 120 gibberish papers: Conference proceedings removed from subscription databases after scientist reveals that they were computer-generated. Nature. Retrieved August 10, 2014, at http://www.nature.com/news/publishers-withdraw-more-than-120-gibberish-papers-1.14763.  (cited in the SCIgen link) 


Additional Note:  All illustrations in this short e-book are original. Information about the technology used in their creation is listed in the Description linked to each media piece. Included photos were provided by the interview subjects.  The copyright for the included video belongs to Brent A. Anders.  
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "References"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Cover, page 12 of 12 Path end, return home