This page is referenced by:

• 1 media/Glossy 1.jpg 2019-11-21T13:59:57-08:00 Free Healthcare with a Price 31 By Lera Toropin image_header 2019-12-08T10:22:58-08:00 In flipping through old issues of Soviet Life, one finds a wide array of articles primarily concerned with presenting only the best that life in the USSR could offer: fashion, recipes, sports success stories, film reviews, detailed descriptions on beautiful travel destinations in Kislovodsk, Zheleznovodsk, and Naryan-Mar, all paired with colorful, enticing photographs. An almost too-good-to-be-true paradise, just beyond the Iron Curtain. “Wouldn’t it be nice to live like this?,” the pages seem to ask, “Why don’t you come visit?”
  
  Generally considered a “polite” form of propaganda, Soviet Life was a glossy magazine designed to present an informed, if not embellished look into Soviet culture for American audiences during the Cold War. Everything worthy of showing off was often included in issues: Yuri Gagarin and the Soviet Space Program was an obvious choice; the achievements of Soviet medicine were another. Keep turning the pages and suddenly they’re whispering, “Don’t you wish you had universal healthcare like us?”
  Certainly, the USSR had plenty to flaunt during the 60’s in regard to the health and well-being of its citizens. Services were cheap, life expectancy was up, and infant mortality rates were down, all thanks to the state-funded healthcare system called the Semashko model. However, the system was actually kept cost-effective and available to all because doctors were paid very low wages to maintain cost control for the public. Preventive medicine - averting the appearance of diseases through immunizations and healthy living - was the top priority. Prophylactics and visits to medicinal spas were stressed, yearly check-ups were made compulsory, and alcoholism was highly discouraged.
  
  For a while, it worked; from its implementation in the 1920’s, Russian citizens came to enjoy all the benefits their new healthcare system provided. The effects of the Semashko model peaked in the 1960’s, and Soviet Life reflects that. Articles from 1966-1968 sing praise of huge strides being made in medicine: a ground-breaking serum has been developed to treat and prevent infantile blood diseases, new radiation sickness treatments are being explored and optimistically predicted to be “controlled completely” in the near future, a brand new operation was just designed for the vertebral artery. Concrete achievements were documented to show American readers that Soviet healthcare was a success.
  
  If that wasn’t enough, the magazine was always ready to fall back on statistics to really underline that life wasn’t just good, it was improving: an engineer who designed a magnet to extract foreign objects from the body has trained 100 apprentices, many of whom are now experts; a pharmaceutical company in Kazakhstan is producing 33-35 million rubles’ worth of medicine annually – 30 different types, shipped to 26 different countries. In 1966, a reader from California writes in to ask, “Is it true that there is a shortage of medical doctors in the USSR?” “No,” the magazine responds, “not by our standards. We have 555,000 doctors. 23.9 for every 10,000 of the population.”  To Soviet Life, the numbers speak for themselves.
  
  So how did the magazine adapt when the reality turned sour? By the late 70’s and 80’s, the Semashko model was drastically on the decline and suffering from diminishing returns on its innovative investments. Years of focus on preventive care and “keeping healthy people healthy” caused other illnesses to rise. Cardiovascular and heart diseases increased significantly, as did the mortality rate in adults. The number of doctors doubled to nearly 1.1 million, but with average salaries of approximately $210 a month and non-existent incentives, quality of care and training deteriorated due to the apathy and low job satisfaction in the field. Money also dried up – the system became so underfunded that citizens had to bring food to their sick relatives in the hospital because most state-fun facilities could no longer afford to feed their patients. Drugs were more difficult to come by, the system was not modernized, and suddenly, the care that one could get for free was being treated with skepticism and distrust.
  
  Interestingly, in response to the growing healthcare crisis and sudden lack of medical achievements to report on, Soviet Life simply carries on, omitting grim facts and doubling down on feel-good articles. Gone are the full page spreads on the latest and greatest findings in Soviet medicine. Most articles in the 80’s now focus on descriptive writing and fluff pieces that seek to amplify the ethos of the 60’s: a day in the life in a resuscitation ward, a travel guide-esque description of a health spa in the Baltic region. There’s a tone of desperation to it: “look here, don’t look over there.”
  
  One piece from 1984 stands out in particular. The word “free,” bold and in the center of the page, is repeated ten times. X-rays? Free. Lab Services? Free. The rest is an article with the Minister of Health, Sergei Burenkov, and Soviet Life, once again, leans heavily on statistics and idea of low costs to emphasize the triumph of healthcare. Burenkov goes through numbers upon numbers like a shopping list until it’s difficult to grasp the weight of them. To a general reader, there’s nothing to compare to. One is simply expected to bask in awe of the fact that because there are 3.5 million beds in the USSR, the healthcare system is as successful as ever. One cannot immediately make the connection that despite that many beds, hospitals were still overcrowded. Or that even with hospitals consuming two-thirds of the total share of state health allocations, it would prove to be woefully insufficient. Reading the pages now, though, it is easy to look between the lines; amidst everything Burenkov is detailing, there is plenty that he is choosing not to say as well.
  
  The original Semashko model eventually collapsed with the USSR in 1991. But the echoes of its successes and failures remain, printed on the glossy pages of a propaganda-driven magazine. In the end, the articles were left with nothing to say but the admission that if a paradise seems too good to be true, it probably is.
   
  
  
  
  Further Readings and Citations:
  Garver, R. A. (1961). Polite Propaganda: “USSR” and “America Illustrated.” Journalism Quarterly, 38(4), 480–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769906103800405
  
  Rowland, Diane and Telyukov, Alexandre V. “Soviet Health Care From Two Perspectives” HEALTH AFFAIRS 1991 Fall; 10(3): 71-86
  
  “The Social Crisis in the Russian Federation.” OECD, 2001. 95-96
  
  Cooper R. “Rising death rates in the Soviet Union: the impact of coronary heart disease.” N Engl J Med. 1981 May 21;304(21):1259–1265
  
  Friedenberg, D S. “Soviet health care system.” The Western journal of medicine vol. 147,2 (1987): 214-7.
  
  Sheiman, Igor et al. “The evolving Semashko model of primary health care: the case of the Russian Federation.” Risk management and healthcare policy vol. 11 209-220. 2 Nov. 2018, doi:10.2147/RMHP.S168399

  Soviet Life, 1966 collection
  Soviet Life, 1968 collection
  Soviet Life, October 1984