Social Policy and Practice, Fall 2018

Assessment/Grading of Hypothes.is Annotations

The following is adapted from W. Ian O’Bryne
 
As you do your Hypothes.is annotations they should reflect your comprehension, inference, and depth/breadth of your interaction with the text.
 
Your responses should indicate that you have located important and key passages in the text.
They can be in the form of questions, reactions and analysis, connections within the text and with other sources or experiences, and/or challenges of an author’s bias or assumptions. You may express opinions but these should be backed up by evidence. Please keep in mind that you may not be able to always hit the 4. An average no less than three for all annotations will put you in the B range on the grading scheme.
 
Your hypothes.is annotations will be graded on a five-point scale (0 to 4) similar to the Sample Scale used to grade other assignments.
 
4.         Key and important passages are annotated with detailed notations.
            Annotations demonstrate a comprehensive and thoughtful reading of the entire piece.
            They show that you have proficiently analyzed the text, and made insightful
            connections to other passages in the text or to other things we’ve read or discussed in class.
            They show deep reading and thinking.
 
3.         Annotations demonstrate understanding of the text.
            They show you have analyzed the text, and made some connections.
            They show you have drawn some conclusions.
            They show some deep reading and thinking.
 
2.         The annotations are basic and consist mainly of literal ideas.
            They show a basic understanding of the text.
            The reader has been able to make one or two connections.
            Has not drawn valid conclusions.
 
1.         The text is marked but annotations do not show adequate understanding of the text.
            The length and depth of the comments is insufficient.
            Annotations may be mere opinions, unsupported by evidence.
            Few, if any, connections are made.
 
0.         Significant parts of the text are unmarked.
            Minimal annotations
            Little evidence of comprehension.