Posthuman Museum Practices: Deconstructing (Sources)
12019-04-17T20:39:53-07:00Charles Sirisawat-Laroucheb6ad6d1a6de4c926cdef3dafe6adb7d5f4702fd8333992plain2019-04-17T20:40:30-07:00Charles Sirisawat-Laroucheb6ad6d1a6de4c926cdef3dafe6adb7d5f4702fd8(1) Deconstruction. II, ed.by A. Papadakis, Architecture Design, London, 1999, p.7. In the essay “Structure, Sign and Play in the Discourse of the Human Sciences”, Derrida warns: “repetitions, substitutions, transformations, and permutations are always taken from a history of meaning [sens] – that is, in a word, a history – whose origin may always be reawakened or whose end may always be anticipated in the form of presence”, in Writing and Difference, Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1978, p.279.
(2) Seely, Stephen D. "How do you dress a body without organs? Affective fashion and nonhuman becoming." Women's Studies Quarterly 41.1/2 (2012): 247-265.
This page has tags:
1media/2000px-Polka_dots.svg.pngmedia/Animated GIF-original.mp42019-04-04T13:16:11-07:00Charles Sirisawat-Laroucheb6ad6d1a6de4c926cdef3dafe6adb7d5f4702fd8Posthuman Museum Practices: DeconstructingCharles Sirisawat-Larouche54Preceding the essence of fashiontags2019-04-17T20:38:44-07:00Charles Sirisawat-Laroucheb6ad6d1a6de4c926cdef3dafe6adb7d5f4702fd8