Searching for truth: Cybervigilantism and networked communication in AsiaMain MenuIntroductionDefinitionsHuman Flesh Search EngineHow Does Cybervigilantism Work?Cases of Cybervigilantism in AsiaIssues and Challenges of CybervigilantismReferences and Recommended ReadingsPauline Cheong3757b238b02af61687e9d4dc8a3b2850a079588f
Human Flesh Search excerpt
12017-06-26T23:41:36-07:00Center for Asian Research, Arizona State University17687588c7a73a9df1c39ba0f30def766ba6540c197202plain2017-06-27T14:03:38-07:00Center for Asian Research, Arizona State University17687588c7a73a9df1c39ba0f30def766ba6540c
This page is referenced by:
12017-06-27T13:50:53-07:00Definitions21plain2019-06-12T17:21:21-07:00In the past few years, acts classified as online or cybervigilantism have attracted much public attention in Asia and worldwide. As online behaviors are constantly evolving, some people confuse this behavior with other forms of cyber-“deviance” like cyber-harassment, cyberbullying, and other acts of political activism.
So, what is cybervigilantism?
According to Smallridge, Wagner, and Crowl (2016), cybervigilantism is applicable to a range of contemporary online behaviors, but must possess at least six features:
At least minimal planning, premeditation, and organization must take place
The act is carried out by private agents or state agents acting outside of their official duties
Agents must not have support or authority granted to them by the state
The act involves non-physical or physical threats, harm, or violence
The motivation behind the act must be a response to perceived crime or social deviance
The goal is to provide assurances of safety or security to group members or target audience
According to Cheong and Gong (2010), crowdsourced acts of vigilantism have been popular. This phenomenon is often described as the “human flesh search engine” in China.
Did you know?
In China, the first widely publicized cyber manhunt was sparked in 2006 by the circulation of online videos showing a woman killing a kitten with her high heels. Enraged netizens posted the woman’s photograph online and urged people to track her down. This virtual collaboration soon brought to light the woman’s name and workplace and led to her occupational suspension and public apology.