Reading Nature, Observing Science: Examining Material Practices in the Lick Observatory Archives and Kenneth S. Norris PapersMain MenuIntroduction to the Lick Observatory ArchivesThe Lick Observatory: Imaging the CosmosThe Lick Observatory: Eclipse ExpeditionsEclipse Intro page (first in a path)Introduction to Kenneth S. Norris PapersKenneth S. Norris Papers: Natural History in PracticeKenneth S. Norris Papers: Pedagogy and ConservationConnections: In Relation to NatureThese images demonstrate the different constructions of nature in the two archivesConnections: Materials of ObservationVisualization of the ConnectionsVisualizes the connections between all the contentReading Nature, Observing ScienceCaptions and information for the cases of objects on display at UCSC Special CollectionsAlex Moore6cd84a9f7efd71803c15562e48a509db9e0bb5a6Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ceDanielle Crawford22ce6a14f83c9ff73c3545a665951a092258f08e
Case 3: Illustrating and Photographing the Cosmos
12016-06-07T14:21:41-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ce91847This case contains documents, images, and objects related to early astrophotographic work at the Lick Observatory.gallery2016-06-07T14:54:13-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ce
Click the above link to read more about this topic. The images on the top shelf of case 3 display a selection of astronomical illustrations from the Lick Observatory archives. Notably, the archives contain sketches and correspondence from famous astronomical illustrator Étienne Trouvelot. Did the ideas and images offered by artists like Trouvelot have an impact on the way astronomers at the Lick perceived the cosmos? Can astronomical illustrations count as factual data? When observing the cosmos, can objectivity be disentangled from aesthetic experience?
Click the above link to read more about this topic. The middle and bottom shelves of case 3 display documents, images, and objects related to the early astrophotographic work of the Lick Observatory. Is it possible to obtain "objective" representations of celestial objects like galaxies and nebula when their details are invisible even in the telescope? How were Lick astronomers' ideas about the objectivity of the camera filtered through the aesthetic concern to produce visually stunning photographs? How is our idea of the reality of the cosmos--then, as now--a matter of aesthetic expectations--certain standards and conventions of representation?
This page has paths:
12016-06-01T16:07:18-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ceReading Nature, Observing ScienceAlex Moore56Captions and information for the cases of objects on display at UCSC Special Collectionsstructured_gallery2016-06-07T15:02:37-07:00Alex Moore6cd84a9f7efd71803c15562e48a509db9e0bb5a6
Contents of this path:
12016-06-01T14:07:48-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ceIllustration of Orion Nebula by E.L. Trouvelot, 1881.2media/Trouvelot_Orion Nebula.jpgplain2016-06-07T15:04:34-07:00Science, Industry, and BusinessChristine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ce
12016-06-01T14:55:27-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ceThe Trouvelot Astronomical Drawings Manual, 1882.2In the book, Trouvelot writes, "Those unacquainted with the use of optical instruments generally suppose that all astronomical drawings are obtained by the photographic process, and are, therefore, comparatively easy to procure; but this is not true. Although photography renders valuable assistance to the astronomer in the case of the Sun and Moon, as proved by the fine photographs of these objects taken by M. Janssen and Mr. Rutherfurd ; yet, for other subjects, its products are in general so blurred and indistinct that no details of any great value can be secured. A well-trained eye alone is capable of seizing the delicate details of structure and of configuration of the heavenly bodies, which are liable to be affected, and even rendered invisible, by the slightest changes in our atmosphere."media/trouvelot_book_1882.jpgplain2016-06-06T14:26:47-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ce
12016-06-01T13:26:08-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ceSketch of Orion Nebula, E.L. Trouvelot, 1875.3media/UA36_Bx 44_TrouvelotSketches001.jpgplain2016-06-01T13:29:46-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ce
12016-06-01T13:49:09-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ceLetter from E.L. Trouvelot to E.S. Holden, 1894.4media/UA36_Bx36_trouvelotletter_1896_full.jpgplain2016-06-02T15:29:04-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ce
1media/UA36/UA36_Bx463A_MarsDrawings_Schaeberle013.jpg2016-05-11T22:14:55-07:00Craig Dietrich2d66800a3e5a1eaee3a9ca2f91f391c8a6893490Illustration of Mars, J.M. Schaeberle (astronomer), 1892.2media/UA36/UA36_Bx463A_MarsDrawings_Schaeberle013.jpgplain2016-06-06T10:23:07-07:001892Lick ObservatoryJohn M. SchaeberleChristine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ce
1media/UA36/UA36_Bx463A_MarsDrawings_Schaeberle012.jpg2016-05-11T22:14:55-07:00Craig Dietrich2d66800a3e5a1eaee3a9ca2f91f391c8a6893490Illustration of Mars, J.M. Schaeberle (astronomer), 1892.3media/UA36/UA36_Bx463A_MarsDrawings_Schaeberle012.jpgplain2016-06-06T10:20:21-07:001892Lick ObservatoryJohn M. SchaeberleChristine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ce
12016-06-02T15:10:39-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ceIllustration of Jupiter, James Keeler (astronomer), 1889.2media/UA36_Bx463b_jupiter023.jpgplain2016-06-02T15:11:15-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ce
12016-06-06T09:55:37-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ceCharles D. Perrine's copybook1media/perrine_comets1898.jpgplain2016-06-06T09:55:37-07:0020160525120131+0000Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ce
1media/UA36/UA36_Bx463B_andromeda1894.jpg2016-05-11T22:14:56-07:00Craig Dietrich2d66800a3e5a1eaee3a9ca2f91f391c8a6893490Andromeda Nebula, photographed by Edward Barnard, 1894.4Professor Edward Barnard produced most of the Lick's early photographic images. He used the smaller Willard telescope, fitted with the type of lens typically used to make portraits, to create this image. N.B.: This is now known as the Andromeda Galaxy. Astronomers did not yet understand the difference between nebulae and galaxies, believing that they were of the same nature.media/UA36/UA36_Bx463B_andromeda1894.jpgplain2016-06-06T10:36:11-07:001894Lick ObservatoryE.E. BarnardChristine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ce
1media/UA36/UA36_Bx463B_spiral1899.jpg2016-05-11T22:14:56-07:00Craig Dietrich2d66800a3e5a1eaee3a9ca2f91f391c8a6893490Great Spiral Nebula (M51), photographer unknown (likely James Keeler), 1899.9This is a four-hour exposure of the Great Spiral Nebula using the 36" Crossley reflector. Note the loss of detail described by Perrine or "faint nebulosity" described in the letters here; compare with the image of the spiral galaxy from 1914. N.B.: This is now known as the Whirlpool Galaxy. Astronomers did not yet understand the difference between nebulae and galaxies, believing that they were of the same nature. Most thought that all of these distant structures were contained within the Milky Way galaxy itself. The difference was confirmed in the 1920s; the work of one of the Lick's astronomers, Heber Curtis, contributed in part to this development.media/UA36/UA36_Bx463B_spiral1899.jpgplain2016-06-06T16:06:11-07:001899Lick ObservatoryChristine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ce
1media/UA36/UA36_Bx463A_Orion Nebula_KeelerCrossley021.jpg2016-05-11T22:14:55-07:00Craig Dietrich2d66800a3e5a1eaee3a9ca2f91f391c8a6893490Orion Nebula, photographed by James Keeler, undated.2media/UA36/UA36_Bx463A_Orion Nebula_KeelerCrossley021.jpgplain2016-06-06T15:39:49-07:00Lick ObservatoryJames E. KeelerChristine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ce
12016-06-03T15:13:26-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ceLetter from Charles Perrine to Photogravure and Color Company, 1907.1Perrine and the printers at the Photogravure and Color Company exchanged a series of letters regarding the difficulties of reproducing the glass negatives of nebulae created at the Lick. Printers used chemicals to "etch" the image of the original glass plate into copper plates. The etched portions were then filled with ink to create a print. Details of the original image were often lost in the process.media/UA36_Bx113_nebulae021-2.jpgplain2016-06-03T15:13:26-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ce
12016-06-03T15:09:59-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ceLetter from Photogravure and Color Company to Charles Perrine, 1907.1Perrine and the printers at the Photogravure and Color Company exchanged a series of letters regarding the difficulties of reproducing the glass negatives of nebulae created at the Lick. Printers used chemicals to "etch" the image of the original glass plate into copper plates. The etched portions were then filled with ink to create a print. Details of the original image were often lost in the process.media/UA36_Bx113_nebulae020-2.jpgplain2016-06-03T15:09:59-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ce
12016-06-05T17:07:25-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ceEtching of the Great Lick Reflector Dome, 1888.1media/UA36_Bx27dome016-2.jpgplain2016-06-05T17:07:25-07:00Christine Turkb279a3dcf419860f915007f04f08e6fc0f8662ce