Micro-Landscapes of the AnthropoceneMain MenuMarginal WorldsPlant WorldsAnimal WorldsAmy Huang, Natasha Stavreski and Rose RzepaWatery WorldsInsect WorldsBird-Atmosphere WorldsContributed by Gemma and MerahExtinctionsMarginal WorldsSam, Zach and AlexE-ConceptsAn emergent vocabulary of eco-concepts for the late AnthropoceneSigi Jöttkandt4115726eb75e75e43252a5cbfc72a780d0304d7d
Mouse with Thylacine genes
12018-10-15T23:54:45-07:00Sigi Jöttkandt4115726eb75e75e43252a5cbfc72a780d0304d7d309861The mouse with tiger DNAplain2018-10-15T23:54:45-07:00Sigi Jöttkandt4115726eb75e75e43252a5cbfc72a780d0304d7d
This page is referenced by:
12018-10-15T23:53:33-07:00Battling Extinction though the Chimera8Extinct Thylacine DNA comes to life in a mouseplain2018-10-16T08:22:11-07:00- Antonia Parker
From the Animal Worlds photo essay, the phrase, "a mixture of genetically different tissues", and the image of a human/pig hybrid reminded me strongly of another image I've seen in connection with both animal worlds and extinctions, my own topic. This image shows a mouse embryo which has had DNA from the extinct thylacine (Tasmanian Tiger) inserted into it. The thylacine DNA was tagged with a blue-green marker. Therefore everything blue-green in the mouse is the DNA of an extinct animal being expressed in a living one. For science, this is an amazing leap forward, and the mouse/thylacine chimera represents real hope that the extinction of the thylacine (and other animals) may not be permanent.
However, how animal worlds presents the chimera forces us to look at this leap of science from an ethical perspective. The embryo was killed before it developed much further, in accordance with ethical guidelines surrounding vertebrates, but there is still a dilemma here. After all, this mouse was injected with foreign DNA that interfered greatly with its own, purely for a science experiment it would never have been able to survive, all so scientists would know whether DNA from a dead animal was viable and able to replicate and express.
In this light, the fate of the mouse seems ethically dubious, but there is another factor to consider. We, as a species, killed the thylacine. We systematically hunted it to extinction for the false accusation of sheep-killing (evidence suggests that Tasmanian tigers were actually pounce-predators who targeted prey weighing 1-5kg, and therefore unlikely to target sheep). So the question is this: do we, as the ones responsible for its extinction, have a moral obligation to the thylacine to do everything we can to bring it back? And if we do, does this moral obligation justify the ethical dubiousness of creating chimeras and using surrogates of another species?