Micro-Landscapes of the Anthropocene

"Inherently voiceless"

I came across this book on audible a while ago called the “The Hidden Life of Trees” by Peter Wohlleben, and it provides some really interesting stories about plants species and how we think they interact by this basic need of survival but the lives of plants actually show a more complex range of interactions.

“But the most astonishing thing about trees is how social they are. The trees in a forest care for each other, sometimes even going so far as to nourish the stump of a felled tree for centuries after it was cut down by feeding it sugars and other nutrients, and so keeping it alive. Only some stumps are thus nourished. Perhaps they are the parents of the trees that make up the forest of today. A tree’s most important means of staying connected to other trees is a “wood wide web” of soil fungi that connects vegetation in an intimate network that allows the sharing of an enormous amount of information and goods. Scientific research aimed at understanding the astonishing abilities of this partnership between fungi and plant has only just begun. The reason trees share food and communicate is that they need each other. It takes a forest to create a microclimate suitable for tree growth and sustenance. So it’s not surprising that isolated trees have far shorter lives than those living connected together in forests.”

I think this suggests that although something like Darwinism, which is by far one of the most impactful sciences we have ever known, may have created this unquestionable thought in our approaches to other objects. Through universalising these ideas of survival we are blinding ourselves to other alternative realities that exist, that nonhuman creatures could be living lives as complex and aimless as ours, but we just aren’t listening to them because we aren't equip with the knowledge or rhetoric to back up these claims. 

- Rose

This page is referenced by: