Thanks for your patience during our recent outage at scalar.usc.edu. While Scalar content is loading normally now, saving is still slow, and Scalar's 'additional metadata' features have been disabled, which may interfere with features like timelines and maps that depend on metadata. This also means that saving a page or media item will remove its additional metadata. If this occurs, you can use the 'All versions' link at the bottom of the page to restore the earlier version. We are continuing to troubleshoot, and will provide further updates as needed. Note that this only affects Scalar projects at scalar.usc.edu, and not those hosted elsewhere.
Caricatures of ViolenceMain MenuIntroductionGender in 19th-Century FranceAllegorical WomenWomen in Contemporary CaricatureQuantitative DataSelected imagesFlip through this gallery to see relevant images that I have selected from the volumes I examined. Click on an image to enlarge it and see more detailed information.BibliographyAbout the AuthorClaire Staceyeb668707c8100c902b771750627b294c13257276
Methodological Challenges
12020-04-13T10:07:03-07:00Claire Staceyeb668707c8100c902b771750627b294c13257276369749plain2020-04-24T16:49:01-07:00Claire Staceyeb668707c8100c902b771750627b294c13257276Gender in 19th-Century FranceAs I examined the journal and began collecting data, several methodological issues and challenges presented themselves. Many of the questions I asked about these images were about the presence or absence of certain visual elements. Thus, they were coded on a binary. The characteristic in question was either marked as present in the image or it was not. This approach became specifically problematic for the collection of data on the presence of women in images. Scholars have long understood gender as a socioculturally constructed category that is much more complex than a male-female binary (Launius and Hassel).While I support this theory, I approached this project with the assumption Philipon and his fellow caricaturists subscribed to traditional notions of gender as a binary category. As I note elsewhere, many of the figures depicted in La Caricature were coded as clearly feminine or clearly masculine. However, some images revealed the flaw in my coding scheme. Plate 255 (above) shows a figure with Louis-Philippe’s hair and Marianne’s clothing running through the mud. It appears that the king has disguised himself as Marianne, the allegorical figure of the French Republic, but I hesitated to code the figure as a man. Typically, clothing was the main indicator I looked at to determine the gender of a figure. I do not believe that Philipon was questioning gender presentation when he published this image, however it did point out the inherent problem in coding gender on a binary.
Coding violence as either present or absent also presented challenges. How should images which imply violence be coded? Armed soldiers are present in most of the images I reviewed. Does that indicate the presence of violence? And what about images in which Marianne takes the place of Jesus in biblical scenes? Viewers of this parody of The Last Supperwould understand the implication that Marianne is about to be betrayed and killed but there is no specifically violent imagery in this caricature.
These questions do not invalidate the quantitative data I collected but rather show the importance of including qualitative analysis to add depth and nuance to our understanding of numeric trends. The data I collected by coding each image did provide interesting information on statistical trends and change over time but these numbers would not be meaningful without an examination of specific images in La Caricature.
1media/Screen Shot 2020-04-13 at 1.10.38 PM_thumb.png2020-04-13T10:10:35-07:00Plate 255: Le chianlit crotté de toutes les façons2media/Screen Shot 2020-04-13 at 1.10.38 PM.pngplain2020-04-24T16:26:47-07:00