This page is referenced by:

• 1 2019-10-28T11:39:10-07:00 Numak'aki Persons and Themes 22 vistag 925416 2021-05-01T05:03:28-07:00
  Notes:

  Click a dot to show or hide its connections.
  Click and hold to drag a dot or the background, to rearrange or reposition.
  Scroll or pinch the background to zoom.
  Also to zoom, double click the background, with the shift key to zoom out.
  Reload Visualization
   

  In this project, I argue that over the winter of 1833–34 Fort Clark and its various spaces constituted a Middle Ground     space, whose practices and shared cultures were actively co-created     by non-Native fur company personnel and the Native residents of the five villages of the Awatíkihu. The basis for this argument is the exchange processes that one sees repeatedly in Prince Maximilian zu Wied-Neuwied’s journals (View Part 2.). This portion of the project reorganizes these journal entries around Numak'aki themes and historical persons.

  The visualization above is interactive. To read about a particular concept or person, simply click on its red circle, then click on the blue “View” button that appears. You can also visit the journal and media pages linked to each concept or historical person by clicking an orange (journal) or green (media) pop-out circle, then clicking the blue “View” button that appears.

  Alternatively, you can choose an entry via the alphabetized hyperlinks below, or by clicking on the blue navigation button at the bottom of the page. The adjacent backward arrows («) key will take you to the previous page in the path, while the greyed section title above each entry’s title will return you to this landing page.

  Click to show help with media and navigation

  To see an image file in greater detail, or to find all other citations of the file throughout the project, click an image to pull up its detailed Media page. You can then travel to other project locations through the citational hyperlinks or click the at the top right to return to your original entry page.

  Photographs of the source journals in old German, written in Wied-Neuwied’s hand, are found at the bottom of each journal page. Click on the image to operate its zoom capability.

  Hyperlinks in each entry connect you to a host of other locations within the project: media files, other journal entries, or thematic and figure pages. Hover over a link and a tooltip will appear to let you know where the link will take you. Once there, a blue “Return” button at the top right will bring you back to your original page (as does the browser back button), if desired. You can also continue forward, making your own choice from the various options linked to the new page.

  There are also cross references to paragraphs in the Scholarly Article. Click on the small text icon in the left margin and a pop-up note appears with the referenced text and a link to the article page (e.g. “portraiture as calumet”    ).

  The Table of Contents for the entire project is always available in the top left corner.

  The Recent Menu displays recently visited pages, useful for retracing one's steps.

• 1 2019-10-28T11:39:05-07:00 Conclusion 2 plain 2019-10-28T18:26:36-07:00

  In this essay, I have put forward the notion that portraits made within Middle Ground spaces have to be understood as co-created products of Middle Ground relations. This notion relies on the presence of multiple cultural frameworks in the interpretations and uses of such portraits. I have worked to demonstrate such a presence through an art historical practice that is local, relational, and culturally flexible. The resulting case study reveals the ways in which local Native residents brought their own specific visual languages and cultural practices to the Fort Clark studio over the winter of 1833–34. Shared cultural behaviors, such as the obligations of fictive kinship, also emerge as important influences on the processes of portrait painting, commissioned object making, and exchange.

  Middle Grounds such as that found at Fort Clark in the early 1830s proved to be quite fragile in the face of US expansionist processes of the nineteenth century. To return to my metaphor of portraiture as calumet    , it is important to note that even as calumets retained their power to bind parties across Middle Ground spaces in the first half of the nineteenth century, the young American republic began to call on this influence and its symbology for their own purposes. The reverse of the Jefferson peace medal, for instance, included a pipe stem crossed with a hatchet above a pair of hands entangled in a handshake (fig. 16). The represented pipe was a pared down reference to the calumet—a confusion of the elaborate calumet stem (see fig. 2) with those of everyday pipes and their often shared act of smoking. By the end of the nineteenth century, these simplified pipes were the “peace pipe” trope of literature and film—one that ran parallel to the continued use of calumets and their various ceremonies among Native communities.

  The roots of this stark diversion of the calumet into parallel uses and meanings among Native and non-Native peoples can be seen among American Fur Company (AFC) documents of the 1830s. The AFC institutionally hosted the Europeans’ two-year tour of North America, and Wied-Neuwied collected a “certificate of good behavior” while at the AFC outpost of Fort McKenzie that depicted an elaborate calumet in the bottom left corner (fig. 17).‍[63] AFC trader Kenneth McKenzie had recently been using the certificates to reward Native leaders and warriors who showed loyalty to his fur trade posts. The seeds of the patriarchal relationship that developed between the US “father” government and those the government viewed as dependent and accommodating Native “children” by the end of the nineteenth century are apparent on McKenzie’s certificate, as the European in top hat exhorts his Native compatriot to “offer [the white man] food and conduct him on his road” in order to “always find friends in your time of need.” Such language requests Native resources with only a vague promise of friendship in return, a radical distortion of the mutual bindings and exchanges that constituted the Middle Ground.

  Yet Wied-Neuwied also collected an oral account of the contract between Fort McKenzie and the local tribes. Narrated verbally through a ka-ka of the Siksika, Pikuni, or Kainah (Blood) tribes, the oral treaty invokes “a firm and lasting peace” that will be testified to when the involved parties meet and “smoke the calumet in friendship and security.”‍[64] The treaty was sealed when the present Native leaders assented that it had “conform[ed] to all ancient customs and ceremonies, etc.” and had “observ[ed] the due mystical signs enjoined by the Grand Medicine Lodges.”‍[65] In this remembering of what bound fort and Native peoples together, the calumet retained local and relational meanings, even as it joined players across vast differences.

  Like calumets, portraits—like those created at Fort Clark—could later be employed within colonial projects that perverted their original meanings. As such objects traveled to distant locales, the potential disconnect from their original intents, purposes, and contexts allowed various agents to rewrite these objects’ associated meanings and shared uses and obligations.‍[66] These rewrites still shape today’s scholarship with regard to Native material cultures and histories.‍[67] An art history of the Middle Ground     works to bring the original local, relational, and culturally flexible contexts of such material culture to the fore, challenging our inherited mythologies as we continue to move and write toward a decolonized future.