MLA Convention 2020: Documenting a Graduate Course in Electronic Literature with ScalarMain MenuMLA Convention 2020: Documenting a Graduate Course in Electronic Literature with ScalarAcknowledgmentNazua IdrisIntroductionKathryn ManisDesigner's StatementNazua IdrisChapter 1: Responding to Major Theoretical Works of Electronic LiteratureSection I: "Intimate Mechanics: One Model of Electronic Literature"Kathryn ManisSection II: "Future Fiction Storytelling Machines"Nazua IdrisSection III: "Digital Interventions"Nazua IdrisSection IV: "Teaching Electronic Literature as Digital Humanities: A Proposal"Ricardo RamirezSection V: "Feminism, Print, Machines"Ricardo RamirezSection VI: "On Turbulence"Ricardo RamirezSection VII: "Literary Gaming"Ricardo RamirezSection VIII: "The Machine in the Text, and the Text in the Machine"Landon RoperSection IX: "Literary Texts as Cognitive Assemblages: The Case of Electronic Literature"Landon RoperChapter 2: Critical Engagements with Electronic LiteratureSection I: "The Ballad of Sand and Harry Soot" by Stephanie StricklandKathryn ManisSection II: "Patchwork Girl" by Shelley JacksonKathryn ManisSection III: "Faith" by Robert KendallNazua IdrisSection IV: “Loss of Grasp” by Serge BouchardonNazua IdrisSection V: "Shy boy" by Thom SwissRicardo RamirezSection VI: "RedRidingHood" by Donna LeishmanRicardo RamirezSection VII: "Tipoemas y Anipoemas" by Ana Maria UribeLandon RoperSection VIII: "Dakota" by Young Hae-Chang Heavy IndustriesLandon RoperChapter 3: Pedagogical Possibilities: Electronic Literature in Classroom and BeyondSection I: At the Intersection of Games and E-Lit: Kathryn Manis in conversation with Nicholas BinfordKathryn ManisSection II: Group Traversal on Judd Morrissey's "The Jew's Daughter"Nazua IdrisSection II: Individual Case StudiesJulian Ankney's CaseNicholas Binford's CaseTroy Rowden's CaseRichard Snyder's CaseRosamond Thalken's CaseConclusionsRicardo RamirezAuthors' BiosNazua IdrisLandon Roperd6bafe98ae021bac254d2976714bb17c121d306b
1media/sandandsoot1.PNGmedia/sandandsoot1.PNGmedia/SandandSoot.PNG2019-02-18T20:16:52-08:00Section I: "The Ballad of Sand and Harry Soot" by Stephanie Strickland15Kathryn Manisimage_header2019-05-05T23:15:47-07:00 The Ballad of Sand and Harry Soot by Stephanie Strickland seems to be a rumination on many things. Among them, the obvious: love, relationships, relationality, beauty, and then the more opaque: music, shapes, cycles, environments, myth, and virus. In some moments, the characters seem to be the materials they are named after. In others, they are characters from Greek myth, elemental properties or sound waves. And in still others, they are the voice of the artist or the critic, prompting us to see and then critique our own associations.
I’m particularly interested in their difference and the tension it creates in the poem. Sure there is the cliché about opposites attracting, but Strickland’s work advances that notion to include difference at the level of element, of code, of genre, and of history. I love how she describes Sand as having a “wardrobe made up of twirlies,” but also as a dragon. Or a “dragon mediation.” Strickland associates her with “portraits of dead children” and “horns”, but also with instruments, whimsy, daffodils, and doves. Where she is dynamic and mysterious, Soot is a constant. In love but a little bit harsh and unyielding; handsome but also “that kind of guy.” Violent, detective-like, and intense, Soot provides a stolid counterpoint to his evolving and evocative partner. In a great moment from the poem, Sand is described as infinitely flexible and therefore deceitful. And Soot screams, “Siren! Circe!” It’s not clear if this is a complement, a criticism, or an observation.
I wonder what we think the role and dynamics of gender in this piece are? The characters are coded male and female, but what are we meant to do with that in light of the poem? I also wonder what we might say about the images and how/what they contribute to the piece? Finally, I’m interested in what effect having the navigation bar at the bottom of the piece might have on our experience of it? Does the ability to click a link at the bottom, rather than moving organically through it, change viewer interaction? And to what result?
And an introduction to the piece, written by Heather McHugh.