Digital Pedagogy Portfolio

rubric

Writing 150: Writing Program General Evaluation Rubric



Features of A and B Writing

A Writing is exceptionally well conceived, developed, organized, and expressed. It will: 

Present a cogent and insightful argument/analysis. 


Provide compelling support for the overall argument/analysis.

Develop its argument or analysis with organizational clarity and logical force.

Demonstrate sophisticated exploration of the issue(s) set forth in the assignment.

Employ a style that reinforces the paper's effectiveness and advances its purpose within the context of the academic discourse community. 

Display maturity in sentence variety, grammar, spelling, and usage.



B Writing offers a consistently strong response to the assignment. It will:

Present a clear, principled argument/analysis.

​Use effective examples and reasoning to support the overall argument/analysis.

Display strong overall organization, paragraph development, and logical transition.

Purposefully address and explore the issue(s) set forth in the assignment.

Employ a style that is appropriate and furthers the purpose of the paper.

Display strength in sentence variety, grammar, spelling, and usage.



The C/D Distinction

C Writing will generally demonstrate the competence expected of college-level writing and reasoning while exhibiting certain shortcomings. It will:

Offer a sometimes competent but often limited argument/analysis in response to the assignment.

Use credible but sometimes underdeveloped or problematic examples and reasoning to support the argument/analysis. 


Display competence in overall organization, paragraph development, and logical transition.

Address the issue(s) set forth in the assignment.

Use a style and tone appropriate to the purpose.

Display general competence in sentence variety, grammar, spelling, and usage.



D Writing ​will offer a limited argument/analysis in response to the assignment wherein shortcomings largely outweigh the positive qualities of the writing. It will be marked by several of the following weaknesses:

​An implausible, unclear, incomplete, or inconsistent argument or analysis.

Inadequate, unconvincing, irrelevant, or derivative support.

​Flaws in organization, paragraph development, or logical transition.

Failure to seriously or thoughtfully address the issue(s) set forth in the assignment. 

An inappropriate style or tone.

Flaws in syntax, grammar

This page has paths:

  1. DIGITAL PEDAGOGIES PORTFOLIO Amanda Jordan

This page has replies:

  1. Sam Harvey Sam Harvey