New York & New Orleans: A Cross-cultural Analysis of Women in Jazz

Rubric

 

Grading Category

1

2

3

4

5

Ease of accessibility -

Is the tool self-explanatory in use or are several trials required before a desired outcome can be achieved?

The project is virtually impossible to use without extensive prior knowledge of its intended use. Countless access issues

Multiple navigation/access issues exist. The project is not very easy to use; requires large amounts of explanation or prior knowledge of its use.

The project is moderately easy to use; some access/ navigation issues are present.

The project creates a user-friendly environment; contains only minor navigation/ access issues.

The project is completely self-explanatory; creates a very user-friendly environment and provides easy access to desired information.

Overall functionality -

does the project successfully remedy the problem it set out to solve? More literally: does it work?

The project entirely fails to achieve the desired outcome, and appears to not even work in principle.

The project has limited success in achieving its intended purpose. Functionality is present, but is also minimal.

The project finds moderate success in achieving its intended purpose. The project is functional, but contains some flaws.

The project solves the specified problem; contains only minor functional flaws.

The project goes above and beyond to solve the specified problem and contains zero functional flaws.

Jazz Narrative effectiveness- Is the narrative and approach effective in conveying the information regarding women in Jazz

Narrative is unfocused, impossible to understand, and does not communicate information effectively.

Slight focus, narrative is relatively unclear and makes an attempt to convey information.

Narrative is focused, information is presented, albeit somewhat less-than effectively.

Narrative is interesting, conveys information well, has an effective overall approach.

Sterling narrative that conveys information immaculately in an intriguing and engaging approach.

Visual interface - is the project visually appealing? Closely tied to ease of access, does it draw the user in and facilitate a positive, interactive experience?

The project’s interface is dry and lacks any kind of visual stimulation; it turns users off from using the project.

The project’s interface demonstrates limited interactivity and visual appeal. Does not create a “pleasant” experience.

The project’s interface is moderately interactive, with mediocre visual appeal. It is neither eye-catching nor visually boring.

The project’s interface is visually appealing and interactive in nature. Overall, creates a pleasant user experience.

The project’s interface is highly interactive and visually enticing to the users. It is clear much thought went into the design to make its use appealing and was created with the user in mind.