Thanks for your patience during our recent outage at scalar.usc.edu. While Scalar content is loading normally now, saving is still slow, and Scalar's 'additional metadata' features have been disabled, which may interfere with features like timelines and maps that depend on metadata. This also means that saving a page or media item will remove its additional metadata. If this occurs, you can use the 'All versions' link at the bottom of the page to restore the earlier version. We are continuing to troubleshoot, and will provide further updates as needed. Note that this only affects Scalar projects at scalar.usc.edu, and not those hosted elsewhere.
Critical Interfaces

Conclusion

This article has argued for an expansion of the domain of "critical making" to include a range of software-based practices including the development and use of authoring tools, archives, and data-driven electronic publications. Consistent with conventional practices of critical making, which draw attention to the systems, materials, and technologies that enable emerging modes of scholarship, I have attempted to demonstrate some of the resonances between development of these digital platforms and the underlying motivations of critical making. Each of the case studies cited here – the electronic journal Vectors, the public media archive Critical Commons, and the electronic authoring platform Scalar – engage issues of both making and criticality from varying but related angles. My goal has not been to undermine what I take to be a beneficial and continuing dialogue surrounding critical making in the humanities but to suggest ways that this conversation might productively extend to include the activities outlined above.

This page has paths:

  1. Critical Interfaces Steve Anderson