Bibliography
Anonymous. (2020, Oct. 20). ACTIVATE LEARNING by thinking about Scalar and our Anthology proposal [Discussion post]. Canvas Course Module, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States. Accessed 2021, Aug. 23. https://camino.instructure.com/courses/65091/discussion_topics/289221?module_item_id=880895
Anonymous. (2020, Nov. 13). REFLECT on the intersection of your group's work with others [Discussion post]. Canvas Course Module, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States. Accessed 2021, Aug. 23. https://camino.instructure.com/courses/65091/discussion_topics/287448?module_item_id=876087
Arola, Kristin L. (2010). The Design of Web 2.0: The Rise of the Template, The Fall of Design. Computers and Composition, 27(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.004
Balcom, David., & Tolva, John. (1996). This is Your Brain on the Internet [Review of the book Hegirascope, by S. Moulthrop]. Kairos 1(2). https://kairos.technorhetoric.net/1.2/reviews/hegirascope/review2.htmlBiesecker, Barbara. (1992). Coming to Terms with Recent Attempts to Write Women into the History of Rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 25(2), 140–161. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40237715
Buchanan, Lindal. (2003). Forging and Firing Thunderbolts: Collaboration and Women's Rhetoric. Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 33(4), 43-63. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3886250
Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. (1993). Biesecker Cannot Speak for Her Either. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 26(2), 153–59. Penn State University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40237761
Campbell, Karlyn Kohrs. (1989). Man Cannot Speak for Her Volume II, Key Texts of the Early Feminists. Praeger University Press.
Carter, Shannon., & Conrad, James H. (2012). In Possession of Community: Toward a More Sustainable Local. College Composition and Communication, 64(1), 15–34.
Cohen, Daniel J., & Rosenzweig, Roy. (2006). Digital History: A Guide to Gathering, Presenting, and Preserving the Past on the Web. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Cohen, Daniel J., et al. "Interchange: The Promise of Digital History." Journal of American History 95, no. 2 (September 2008): 452-491. Accessed April 22, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/25095630
Coker, Cait., & Ozment, Kate. (2019). Building the Women in Book History Bibliography, or Digital Enumerative Bibliography as Preservation of Feminist Labor. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, 13(3).
Curet, Avery. (2020, Oct. 25). ACTIVATE LEARNING by thinking about group work [Discussion post]. Canvas Course Module, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States. Accessed 2021, Sept. 22. https://camino.instructure.com/courses/65091/discussion_topics/283777?module_item_id=866670
Desisto, Gabrielle. (2020, Oct. 26) ACTIVATE LEARNING by thinking about group work [Discussion post]. Canvas Course Module, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States. Accessed 2021, Sept. 23. https://camino.instructure.com/courses/65091/discussion_topics/283777?module_item_id=866670
Douglas, J. Yellowlees. (2001). The End of Books--or Books Without End? University of Michigan Press.
Ede, Lisa., & Lunsford, Andrea A. (2001). Collaboration and concepts of authorship. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 116(2), 354-369
Enoch, Jessica., & Gold, David. (2013). Introduction: Seizing the Methodological Moment: The Digital Humanities and Historiography in Rhetoric and Composition. College English, 76(2), 105-114.
Enoch, Jessica., & Bessette, Jean. (2013). Meaningful engagements: Feminist historiography and the digital humanities. College Composition and Communication, 634-660.
Enoch, Jessica., & Ramirez, Cristina. (2019). Mestiza Rhetorics: An Anthology of Mexicana Activism in the Spanish-Language Press, 1887-1922. Southern Illinois University Press.
Enoch, Jessica., & VanHaitsma, Pamela. (2015). Archival literacy: Reading the rhetoric of digital archives in the undergraduate classroom. College Composition and Communication, 216-242.
Fancher, Patricia. (2017). TechnoFeminist Rhetoric of Design. Computers and Composition Online. http://cconlinejournal.org/techfem_si/04_Fancher/
Fancher, Patricia., Kirsch, Gesa., & Williams, Allison. (2020). Feminist Practices in Digital Humanities Research: Visualizing Women Physician’s Networks of Solidarity, Struggle and Exclusion. Peitho, 22(2). https://cfshrc.org/article/ feminist-practices-in-digital-humanities-research-visualizing-women-physicians-networks-of-solidarity-struggle-and-exclusion/
Frank, Sarah Noble. (2017). Feminist Historiography As If: Performativity and Representation in Feminist Histories of Rhetoric. Rhetoric Review, 36(3), 187-199.
Fyfe, Paul. (2020). Digital Pedagogy Unplugged. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 5(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/0874-k673
Gallon, Kim. (2016). Making a Case for the Black Digital Humanities. In Gold, M.K., & Klein, L.F. (Eds.) Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016. University of Minnesota Press. https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/projects/debates-in-the-digital-humanities-2016
García, Romeo. (2018). Creating Presence from Absence and Sound from Silence. Community Literacy Journal, 13(1), 7-15.
Gaul, Theresa Strouth. (2010). " Sojourners in the Archive": reflections on the art of recovery work. Legacy: A Journal of American Women Writers, 27(1), 128-129.
Graban, Tarez Samra. (2013). From location(s) to locatability: Mapping feminist recovery and archival activity through metadata. College English, 76(2), 171-193.
Graban, Tarez Samra., Ramsey-Tobienne, Alexis., & Myers, Whitney. (2015). In, Through, and About the Archive: What Digitization (Dis) Allows. Rhetoric and the Digital Humanities, 233-244. University of Chicago Press.
Gutierrezvaldes, Raquel. (2020, Oct.27). ACTIVATE LEARNING by thinking about group work [Discussion post]. Canvas Course Module, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States. Accessed 2021, Sept. 24. https://camino.instructure.com/courses/65091/discussion_topics/283777?module_item_id=866670
Haskins, Ekaterina. (2007). Between Archive and Participation: Public Memory in a Digital Age, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 37(4), 401-422. https://doi.org/10.1080/02773940601086794
Garcia, Romeo. (2019). Creating Presence from Absence and Sound from Silence. Community Literacy Journal 13(1), 7 -15. https://doi.org/10.25148/clj.13.1.009086
Hartman, Saidiya. (2008). Venus in Two Acts. Small Axe, Number 26 12(2), 1-14.
Hayden, Wendy. (2017). And Gladly Teach: The Archival Turn's Pedagogical Turn. College English, 80(2), 133-158.
Joyce, Michael. (1988). Siren Shapes: Exploratory and Constructive Hypertexts. Academic Computing, 3(4), 10-42.
Johnson, Jessica Marie. (2018). Markup Bodies: Black [Life] Studies and Slavery [Death] Studies at the Digital Crossroads. Social Text 137, 36(4), 57-79. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-7145658
Joudy, J. (2020, Oct. 26). ACTIVATE LEARNING by thinking about group work [Discussion post]. Canvas Course Module, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States. Accessed 2021, Sept. 23. https://camino.instructure.com/courses/65091/discussion_topics/283777?module_item_id=866670
Kirsch, Gesa. E., & Royster, Jacqueline Jones. (2010). Feminist rhetorical practices: In search of excellence. College Composition and Communication, 640-672.
Kuhn, Virginia. (2013). Filmic Texts and the Rise of the Fifth Estate. International Journal of Learning and Media. https://scalar.usc.edu/anvc/kuhn/two-paths?path=structure-of-filmic-texts-and-the-rise-of-the-fifth-estate
Levy, Michelle. (2010). Women and Print Culture, 1750–1830. In Labbe, J.M. (Editor) The History of British Women’s Writing, 1750–1830. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230297012_2
Lewis, Sarah. (2016). Vision and Justice: Guest Editor's Note. Aperature 23. https://aperture.org/editorial/vision-justice/
Logan, Shirley Wilson. (1995). With Pen and Voice: A Critical Anthology of Nineteenth-Century African-American Women. Southern Illinois University Press.
Landow, George P. The Victorian Web. https://victorianweb.org/index.html
McKee, Heidi. A., & Porter, James E. (2012). The Ethics of Archival Research. College Composition and Communication 64, 59-81.
Morris, Charles. E. (2006). The Archival Turn in Rhetorical Studies; Or, the Archive's Rhetorical (Re) turn. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 9(1), 113-115.
McPherson, Tara. (2009). Media Studies and the Digital Humanities. Cinema Journal 48(2),119-23.
Purdy, James P. (2011). Three gifts of digital archives. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 12(3), 24-49.
Rawson, K. J. (2010). Queering feminist rhetorical canonization. Rhetorica in motion: Feminist rhetorical methods and methodologies, 39-52.
Reed, Ashley. (2018). The Trials and Errors of Building Prudence Person's Scrapbook. In An Annotated Digital Edition. J. Travis & J. DeSpain (Eds.), Teaching with Digital Humanities : Tools and Methods for Nineteenth-Century American Literature, University of Illinois Press.
Rice, James. (2013, Nov. 5). The Search for Billy the Kid | enculturation. http://enculturation.net/billythekid
Rivard, Courtney., Arnold, Taylor., & Tilton, Lauren. (2019). Building Pedagogy into Project Development: Making Data Construction Visible in Digital Projects. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly, 13(2).Ritchie, Joy S., & Ronald, Kate. (Eds.). (2001). Available means: An anthology of women's rhetoric (s). University of Pittsburgh Press.
Rusnak, Samantha. (2020, Oct. 18). ACTIVATE LEARNING by thinking about Scalar and our Anthology proposal [Discussion post]. Canvas Course Module, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States. Accessed 2021, Aug. 23. https://camino.instructure.com/courses/65091/discussion_topics/289221?module_item_id=880895
Rusnak, Samantha. (2020, Dec. 6). REFLECT on our course experience and key take-aways [Discussion post]. Canvas Course Module, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA, United States. Accessed 2021, Aug. 21. https://camino.instructure.com/courses/65091/discussion_topics/291496?module_item_id=887523
Selfe, Cynthia L., & Selfe, Richard J. (1994). The Politics of the Interface: Power and Its Exercise in Electronic Contact Zones. College Composition and Communication, 45(4), 480-504.
Sharer, Wendy B. (2021). Venues and Voices: Welcoming Greater Participation in Feminist Rhetorical History and Inquiry. In Dayton, A. and Vaughn, J. (Eds.) Ethics and Representation in Feminist Rhetorical Inquiry,. University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 218-236.
Shivener, Rich. (2020). Theorizing Rhetorical-Affective Workflows: Behind the Scenes with Webtext Authors 1. College English, 83(1), 42-65.
Solberg, Janine. (2012). Googling the archive: Digital tools and the practice of history. Advances in the History of Rhetoric, 15(1), 53-76.
Waite, Stacey. (2017). Teaching Queer: Radical Possibilities for Writing and Knowing. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Wang, Bo. (2012). Rethinking Feminist Rhetoric and Historiography in a Global Context: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Advances in the History of Rhetoric, 15, 28-52.
Wu, Hui. (2005). The Paradigm of Margaret Cavendish: Reading Women's Alternative Rhetorics in a Global Context. Calling cards: Theory and practice in the study of race, gender, and culture, pp. 171-186.
VanHaitsma, Pamela. (2019). Digital LGBTQ archives as sites of public memory and pedagogy. Rhetoric and Public Affairs, 22(2), 253-280.
VanHaitsma, Pamela. (2015). New Pedagogical Engagements with Archives: Student Inquiry and Composing in Digital Spaces. College English 78(1), 34–55.
Vaughn, Jennie., & Dayton, Amy. (2021). Ethics and Representation in Feminist Rhetorical Inquiry. University of Pittsburgh Press.