Composing Collaborative Feminist Recovery Projects with Scalar

Bibliography

Almjeld, Jen et al. (2016). The F-Word: A Decade of Hidden Feminism in Kairos. Kairos 20.2 Spring 2016. https://kairos.technorhetoric.net/20.2/reviews/almjeld-et-al/index.html

Anonymous Student-Author 1. (2020, October 20).  "ACTIVATE LEARNING by thinking about Scalar and our Anthology proposal." [Discussion post].  Canvas, Camino, Santa Clara University. Retrieved August 23 August 2021, 2021, https://camino.instructure.com/courses/65091/discussion_topics/289221?module_item_id=880895. 

Anonymous Student-Author 2. (2020, November 13). "REFLECT on the intersection of your group's work with others.'" [Discussion post]. Canvas, Camino, Santa Clara University. Retreived 23 August 2021, from https://camino.instructure.com/courses/65091/discussion_topics/287448?module_item_id=876087.

Arola, K. L. (2010). The Design of Web 2.0: The Rise of the Template, The Fall of Design. Computers and Composition, 27(1), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2009.11.004

David Balcom and John Tolva.(1996).  "This is Your Brain on the Internet": A Review of Stuart Moulthrop's Hegirascope. Kairos 1.2 https://kairos.technorhetoric.net/1.2/reviews/hegirascope/review2.html

Biesecker, B. (1992). Coming to Terms with Recent Attempts to Write Women into the History of Rhetoric. Philosophy & Rhetoric, 25(2), 140–161. http://www.jstor.org/stable/40237715

Buchanan, L. (2003). Forging and firing thunderbolts: Collaboration and women's rhetoric. Rhetoric Society Quarterly33(4), 43-63.

Campbell, K.K. (1993). “Biesecker Cannot Speak for Her Either.” Philosophy & Rhetoric, vol. 26, no. 2, Penn State University Press, pp. 153–59, http://www.jstor.org/stable/40237761.
--. Man cannot speak for her: Volume II; Key texts of the early feminists. ABC-CLIO.

​​​​​Carter, S. and J. H. Conrad. (2012). “In Possession of Community: Toward a More Sustainable Local.” College Composition and Communication, vol. 64, no. 1,  pp. 15–34.

Cohen, D. J., & Rosenzweig, R. (2006). Digital History: A Guide to Gathering, Presenting, and Preserving the Past on the Web.

Coker, C., & Ozment, K. (2019). Building the Women in Book History Bibliography, or Digital Enumerative Bibliography as Preservation of Feminist Labor. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly13(3).

Curet, Avery.  (2020, October 25).  "ACTIVATE LEARNING by thinking about group work." [Discussion post]. Canvas, Camino, Santa Clara University, Retrieved September 22, 2021, from https://camino.instructure.com/courses/65091/discussion_topics/283777?module_item_id=866670.

Desisto, Gabrielle. (2020, 26 October) "ACTIVATE LEARNING by thinking about group work." [Discussion post[. Canvas, Camino, Santa Clara University, Retrieved September, 23 2021, from https://camino.instructure.com/courses/65091/discussion_topics/283777?module_item_id=866670.

Douglas, Jane Yellowlees. (2001). The End of Books--or Books Without End? University of Michigan Press. 

Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. A. (2001). Collaboration and concepts of authorship. PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America116(2), 354-369.

Enoch, J., & Gold, D. (2013). Introduction: Seizing the methodological moment: The digital humanities and historiography in rhetoric and composition. College English76(2), 105-114.

Enoch, J., & Bessette, J. (2013). Meaningful engagements: Feminist historiography and the digital humanities. College Composition and Communication, 634-660.

Enoch, J., & Ramirez, C. (2019). Mestiza Rhetorics: An Anthology of Mexicana Activism in the Spanish-Language Press, 1887-1922. Southern Illinois University Press, 2019. 

Enoch, J., & VanHaitsma, P. (2015). Archival literacy: Reading the rhetoric of digital archives in the undergraduate classroom. College Composition and Communication, 216-242.

Fancher, P. (2017). TechnoFeminist Rhetoric of Design. Cconlinejournal. http://cconlinejournal.org/techfem_si/04_Fancher/

Fancher, Patricia, Gesa Kirsch, and Alison Williams. “Feminist Practices in Digital Humanities Research: Visualizing Women Physician’s Networks of Solidarity, Struggle and Exclusion.” Peitho, vol. 22, no. 2, 2020, https://cfshrc.org/article/ feminist-practices-in-digital-humanities-research-visualizing-women-physicians-networks-of-solidarity-struggle-and-exclusion/.

Ferguson, Moira, and Janet Todd. (1984) Mary Wollstonecraft. Twayne Publishers.

Frank, S. N. (2017). Feminist Historiography As If: Performativity and Representation in Feminist Histories of Rhetoric. Rhetoric Review36(3), 187-199.

Fyfe, Paul. (2020). Digital Pedagogy Unplugged. Digital Humanities Quarterly: 5(3)http://dx.doi.org/10.17613/0874-k673.

Gallon, Kim. (2016). Making a Case for the Black Digital Humanities. Debates in the Digital Humanities 2016. Eds. Matthew K. Gold and Lauren F. Klein. University of Minnesota Press, 2016. https://dhdebates.gc.cuny.edu/projects/debates-in-the-digital-humanities-2016 

García, R. (2018). Creating Presence from Absence and Sound from Silence. Community Literacy Journal13(1), 7-15.

Gaul, T. S. (2010). " Sojourners in the Archive": reflections on the art of recovery work. Legacy: A Journal of American Women Writers27(1), 128-129.

Graban, T. S. (2013). From location (s) to locatability: Mapping feminist recovery and archival activity through metadata. College English76(2), 171-193.

Graban, T. S., Ramsey-Tobienne, A., & Myers, W. (2015).  In, Through, and About the Archive: What Digitization (Dis) Allows. In Rhetoric and the digital humanities (pp. 233-244). University of Chicago Press.

Griffin, G., & Hayler, M. S. (2018). Collaboration in Digital Humanities Research–Persisting Silences. Digital Humanities Quarterly12(1), 1-33.

Gutierrezvaldes, Raquel.  (2020 October 27). "ACTIVATE LEARNING by thinking about group work." Canvas, Camino, Santa Clara University, Retrieved September 24, 2021, from https://camino.instructure.com/courses/65091/discussion_topics/283777?module_item_id=866670. 

Ekaterina Haskins (2007) Between Archive and Participation: Public Memory in a Digital Age, Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 37:4, 401-422, DOI:10.1080/02773940601086794

Garcia, Romeo. Creating Presence from Absence and Sound from Silence. Community Literacy Journal vol. 13, no. 1, 2019, pp. 7 -15. doi:10.25148/clj.13.1.009086.

Hartman, Saidiya. Venus in Two Acts. Small Axe, Number 26 (Volume 12, Number 2), June 2008, pp. 1-14. 

Hayden, W. (2017). And gladly teach: The archival turn's pedagogical turn. College English80(2), 133-158.

Joyce, Michael. (1988). Siren shapes: Exploratory and constructive hypertexts. Academic Computing.3(4), 10-42.

Johnson, Jessica Marie. (2018). Markup Bodies: Black [Life] Studies and Slavery [Death] Studies at the Digital Crossroads. Social Text 137, Vol. 36, No. 4, pp. 57-79. DOI 10.1215/01642472-7145658

Joudy, Jessica. (2020 October 26). "ACTIVATE LEARNING by thinking about group work." Canvas, Camino, Santa Clara University, Retrieved September 23, 2021, from https://camino.instructure.com/courses/65091/discussion_topics/283777?module_item_id=866670. Accessed 23 September 2021.

Kirsch, G. E., & Royster, J. J. (2010). Feminist rhetorical practices: In search of excellence. College Composition and Communication, 640-672.
Levy Michelle. (2010) Women and Print Culture, 1750–1830. In: Labbe J.M. (eds) The History of British Women’s Writing, 1750–1830. The History of British Women’s Writing. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230297012_2.

Kuhn, Virginia. (2013). Filmic Texts and the Rise of the Fifth Estate. International Journal of Learning and Media. https://scalar.usc.edu/anvc/kuhn/two-paths?path=structure-of-filmic-texts-and-the-rise-of-the-fifth-estate

Levy, Michelle.

Lewis, Sarah. Vision and Justice: Guest Editor's Note. Aperature 23 Feb 2016. https://aperture.org/editorial/vision-justice/

Logan, Shirley Wilson. (1995) With Pen and Voice: A Critical Anthology of Nineteenth-Century African-American Women. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale.

Landow, George. "The Victorian Web." https://victorianweb.org/index.html

McKee, Heidi A. and James E. Porter. “The Ethics of Archival Research.” College Composition and Communication 64 (2012): pp. 59-81.

Morris, C. E. (2006). The Archival Turn in Rhetorical Studies; Or, the Archive's Rhetorical (Re) turn. Rhetoric & Public Affairs9(1), 113-115.
McPherson, Tara. "Media Studies and the Digital Humanities." Cinema Journal 48.2 (2009): 119-23.

Purdy, J. P. (2011). Three gifts of digital archives. Journal of Literacy and Technology12(3), 24-49.

Rawson, K. J. (2010). Queering feminist rhetorical canonization. Rhetorica in motion: Feminist rhetorical methods and methodologies, 39-52.

Reed, Ashley. (2018). The Trials and Errors of Building Prudence Person's Scrapbook: An Annotated Digital Edition. J. Travis & J. DeSpain (Eds.), Teaching with Digital Humanities : Tools and Methods for Nineteenth-Century American Literature, University of Illinois Press.

Rice, J. (2013, November 5). The Search for Billy the Kid | enculturation. Http://Enculturation.Net/Billythekid. http://enculturation.net/billythekid

Rivard, C., Arnold, T., & Tilton, L. (2019). Building Pedagogy into Project Development: Making Data Construction Visible in Digital Projects. DHQ: Digital Humanities Quarterly13(2).

Ritchie, J., & Ronald, K. (Eds.). (2001). Available means: An anthology of women's rhetoric (s). University of Pittsburgh Press.

Rusnak, Samantha.  (2020 October 18). "ACTIVATE LEARNING by thinking about Scalar and our Anthology proposal." Canvas, Camino, Santa Clara University, Retrieved August 23, 2021 from https://camino.instructure.com/courses/65091/discussion_topics/289221?module_item_id=880895. 

Rusnak, Samantha. (2020 6 December). "REFLECT on our course experience and key take-aways." Canvas, Camino, Santa Clara University, Retrieved August 20 2021 from https://camino.instructure.com/courses/65091/discussion_topics/291496?module_item_id=887523. 

Selfe, Cinthia L. and Richard J. Selfe. (1994). The Politics of the Interface: Power and Its Exercise in Electronic Contact Zones. College Composition and Communication , Dec., 1994, Vol. 45, No. 4 (Dec., 1994), pp. 480-504

Sharer, Wendy B. (2021). Venues and Voices: Welcoming Greater Participation in Feminist Rhetorical History and Inquiry. In Ethics and Representation in Feminist Rhetorical Inquiry, Eds. Amy Dayton and Jennie Vaughn. University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 218-236. 

Shivener, R. (2020). Theorizing Rhetorical-Affective Workflows: Behind the Scenes with Webtext Authors 1. College English83(1), 42-65.

Solberg, J. (2012). Googling the archive: Digital tools and the practice of history. Advances in the History of Rhetoric15(1), 53-76.

Turkel, W. J. (2008). Interchange: The promise of digital history. The Journal of American History95(2), 452-491.

Waite, Stacey. Teaching Queer: Radical Possibilities for Writing and Knowing. University of Pittsburgh Press, 2017. 

Wang, Bo. Rethinking Feminist Rhetoric and Historiography in a Global Context: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Advances in the History of Rhetoric, 15:28–52, 2012

Wu, H. (2005). The Paradigm of Margaret Cavendish: Reading Women's Alternative Rhetorics in a Global Context. Calling cards: Theory and practice in the study of race, gender, and culture, 171-186.

VanHaitsma, P. (2019). "Digital LGBTQ archives as sites of public memory and pedagogy. "Rhetoric and Public Affairs22(2), 253-280.
--VanHaitsma, Pamela. 2015. “New Pedagogical Engagements with Archives: Student Inquiry and Composing in Digital Spaces.” College English 78, no. 1: 34–55.

Vaughn, J., & Dayton, A. (2021). Ethics and Representation in Feminist Rhetorical Inquiry. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

This page has paths: