This page was created by Ray Li.
Public Reaction
Other people were not as impressed. An article published in the Los Angeles Times stated that tenants in New York showed an “aversion to going above forty stories from the ground.”[3] According to one of the largest renting agencies in the city, some tenants “complain[ed] of the long elevator journey, others the comparative isolation, and still others [were] honest enough to admit a shade of dread or doubt.”27 No floors were tenanted above the forty first story in the Woolworth Building.27
Despite this, Otis Brothers & Co. used the project to further promote their business. An advertisement for the company featured a large image of the Woolworth Building on the front. The flyer went on to describe the Otis elevator as:
The Woolworth Building’s elevator service was certainly recognized as one of the factors for the skyscraper’s success. If it had been equipped with traditional hydraulic elevators, a trip up and down the building without a single stop would have taken more than ten minutes.29 If stops were factored in, “more than half an hour would be consumed in making the trip.”[5]“The greatest factor in the up building of the world today – the ONE thing that has made possible the construction of the Titanic structures of stone and steel that everywhere dot the marts of trade and industry – the ONE thing that has heightened the ‘sky line’, and marvelously increased the land values of the world’s greatest cities, insuring to them unlimited development, concentration and prosperity.”[4]
[1] "WOOLWORTH TOWER VIEW AMAZES BALFOUR." New York Times (1857-1922), May 13, 1917.
[2] "Prince Rides in Subway Jam Twice." The New York Herald, New York Tribune (1924-1926), Sep 13, 1924.
[3] "HEIGHT OF BUILDINGS REACHED." Los Angeles Times (1886-1922), Feb 12, 1914.
[4] Otis Brothers & Co. "Otis Elevators." Advertisement. Architects' and Builders' Magazine, December 1913, 17.