Urban Sights: Urban History and Visual CultureMain MenuIntroductionConflicting Visions of Renewal in Pittsburgh's Hill District, 1950-1968 by Laura GrantmyreSan Francisco Views: Robert Bechtle and the Reformulation of Urban Vision by Bridget GilmanVisualizing Iraq: Oil, Cinema, and the Modern City by Mona DamlujiFilmic Witness to the 1964 Kitty Genovese Murder by Carrie RentschlerBuses from Nowhere: Television and Anti-busing Activism in 1970s Urban America by Matt DelmontMona Damluji89c6177132ce9094bd19f4e5159eb300a76ef0dfMatthew F. Delmont5676b5682f4c73618365582367c04a35162484d5Bridget Gilman032da9b6b9003c284100547a1d63b1ed9aca49e2Laura Grantmyre8add17c1c26ed9de6b804f44312bd03052f5735eCarrie Rentschlere7ded604f66cae2062fa490f51234edecd44a076
The Silent Majority Watches Claude Kirk
12013-07-25T06:30:51-07:00Matthew F. Delmont5676b5682f4c73618365582367c04a35162484d525512plain2013-08-16T08:58:12-07:00Matthew F. Delmont5676b5682f4c73618365582367c04a35162484d5While it is difficult to gauge how people judged Kirk’s protests, the governor’s office received (and archived) over fifteen hundred letters and telegrams that offer insight into how citizens and viewers made sense of Kirk’s defiance. Over ninety-five percent of the mail Kirk received regarding busing in these months was positive, with most of the negative letters coming from his Florida constituents. What is striking in this correspondence is how many people outside of the South supported Kirk’s protests and how many explicitly identified themselves as members of the “Silent Majority.” “I saw on the news tonight the stand you took on the schools,” a telegram from Cleveland said. “Please stand firm on it I am 100% behind you.” A writer in Youngstown noted, “Many of us, here up North, wish to commend you, for your stand on ‘bussing’ students,” while “A Concerned Senior Citizen” from Syracuse suggested, “There are many Northerners opposed to busing but you do not hear about them.” A mother from Detroit expressed concern that Kirk’s call for a uniform policy would hurt the North: “I speak for everyone of us white middle income suburban parents…we are completely in sympathy with you…But for heaven’s sake, don’t attack us, help us to work together to protect our children. Certainly if hundreds of millions of white parents stick together we are a greater force than some supreme court [sic] judges.” A mother from Seattle thanked Kirk “for speaking out and supporting the sometimes too silent majority who oppose the forced integration policy in our public schools,” and a letter signed “Silent Majority” from South Bend predicted, “If you need funds, make a request, and I’m sure the Silent Majority will come thru.” Kirk’s busing protests would not have reached as large of a national audience—from Syracuse to Seattle and South Bend to San Antonio—without television news. Television news made a local integration dispute in Bradenton, Florida meaningful for people across the country and helped to establish busing as a “massive” issue. Ultimately, Kirk was more successful at rallying support and fueling emotions of these national busing opponents than he was at stopping busing in Florida. [The map below highlights quotations from over seventy of the letters and telegrams Kirk’s office received. Click on envelope icons to see text. To zoom in on regions with clusters of letters double-click on map or use “+” icon at top left of map.]
(All letters from Claude R. Kirk Jr. Papers, series 923, boxes 14-16, State Archives of Florida)
This page has paths:
12013-08-15T18:43:22-07:00Matthew F. Delmont5676b5682f4c73618365582367c04a35162484d5Claude Kirk's Politics of ConfrontationMatthew F. Delmont19plain179412015-08-29T12:30:40-07:00Matthew F. Delmont5676b5682f4c73618365582367c04a35162484d5