Sign in or register
for additional privileges

“Fine Dignity, Picturesque Beauty, and Serious Purpose”:

The Reorientation of Suffrage Media in the Twentieth Century

Emily Scarbrough, Author

You appear to be using an older verion of Internet Explorer. For the best experience please upgrade your IE version or switch to a another web browser.

White Supremacy as a Tenet of Suffragism

Suffragists sometimes struggled to present a singular message as the leaders of the movements rejected the support of the poor, ethnic immigrants, or African Americans. For instance, Frances Willard, a suffragist and leader of the Women’s Christian Temperance Union (WCTU), blamed “illiterate aliens” and “a plantation negro, who can neither read nor write, whose ideas are bounded by the fence of his own field and the price of his own mule” for the defeat of temperance legislation in the south.[1] Carrie Chapman Catt, the leader of NAWSA from 1900 to 1904 and again from 1916 to 1920 was certainly reluctant to appeal to immigrant voters, but even more so to African American voters. Under her lead, NAWSA argued on several occasions that female enfranchisement would help reinforce white supremacy by giving white women votes to outnumber black men. Some members of NAWSA went so far to advocate the concept of an educated voter, who would be required to pass literacy tests for access to the ballot.[2] 

            Some suffragists argued that only educated people – men and women – should be allowed to vote. They supported literacy tests as a measure of who could vote, which excluded both a majority of blacks and of immigrants. Some later suffragists like Harriot Stanton Blatch and Alice Stone Blackwell argued instead that less educated citizens still deserved the vote and that exercising in participatory politics would, in fact, elevate them. Other suffrage leaders
Alice Paul and Carrie Chapman Catt excluded black women and argued that added laws concerning literacy would strengthen white supremacy. In one book written to persuade southern congressmen to support woman’s suffrage, Catt wrote, “White supremacy will be strengthened, not weakened, by woman suffrage.”
[3] She provided tables and
population data to prove that the white female vote would give more political power to southern whites rather than to African Americans. She argued that regulations like property qualifications and literacy tests would further eliminate black voting power, while elevating the political power of whites, both male and female.


[1]  Ida B. Well, Crusade for Justice, Alfreda Duster, ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970), 207.

[2]  For one of the most racist appeals for woman’s suffrage consider Belle Kearney’s “Durable White Supremacy,” an address to the 1903 NAWSA convention, in which she argues that “the enfranchisement of women would insure the immediate and durable white supremacy, honestly attained.” Ida Husted Harper, History of Woman Suffrage vol 5 (New York: J.J. Little and Ives Company, 1922), 82.

[3]  Carrie Chapman Catt, Woman Suffrage by Federal Constitutional Amendment, (New York: National Woman Suffrage Publishing Co., 1917), 76.
Comment on this page
 

Discussion of "White Supremacy as a Tenet of Suffragism"

Add your voice to this discussion.

Checking your signed in status ...

Previous page on path Chapter One "An American Girl", page 13 of 14 Next page on path